EC
Price
$7.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
109 days until earnings call
SU
Price
$40.44
Change
+$0.84 (+2.12%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EC vs SU

Header iconEC vs SU Comparison
Open Charts EC vs SUBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$7.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.87M
CapitalizationN/A
Suncor Energy
Price$40.44
Change+$0.84 (+2.12%)
Volume$8.43M
CapitalizationN/A
EC vs SU Comparison Chart
Loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. SU commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Sell and SU is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (EC: $7.73 vs. SU: $40.44)
Brand notoriety: EC: Not notable vs. SU: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 295% vs. SU: 221%
Market capitalization -- EC: $21.83B vs. SU: $48.23B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $21.83B. SU’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $48.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than EC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EC and SU are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

SU is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.94% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SU($48.2B) has a higher market cap than EC($21.8B). SU has higher P/E ratio than EC: SU (7.96) vs EC (4.87). SU YTD gains are higher at: 26.217 vs. EC (-21.087). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.36T vs. SU (17.8B). EC has higher revenues than SU: EC (148.1T) vs SU (52.2B).
ECSUEC / SU
Capitalization21.8B48.2B45%
EBITDA49.36T17.8B277,309%
Gain YTD-21.08726.217-80%
P/E Ratio4.877.9661%
Revenue148.1T52.2B283,715%
Total CashN/A1.73B-
Total DebtN/A15.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs SU: Fundamental Ratings
EC
SU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
1651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (2) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (33). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EC (100). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (16) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SU (51). This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (86). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EC (82). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECSU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DXLG3.000.02
+0.67%
Destination XL Group
PMD2.360.01
+0.43%
Psychemedics Corp
LPLA314.540.16
+0.05%
LPL Financial Holdings
ALE64.54-0.18
-0.28%
ALLETE
CYRX7.38-0.29
-3.78%
CryoPort

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+5.03%
CVE - EC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
IMO - EC
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
BP - EC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
SU - EC
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
SHEL - EC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with IMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then IMO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
+2.12%
IMO - SU
81%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
CVE - SU
80%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
SHEL - SU
70%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
XOM - SU
70%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
CVX - SU
67%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
More