Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$35.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets848.26M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.75
Change+$0.22 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.57B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.6B vs. ECEAX (848M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. ECEAX (9.21). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.01 vs. RGWBX (36.31).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.077 | 18.118 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 848M | 24.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 13.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.66 | 60.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.01 | 36.31 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.56 | 93.12 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement