Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$33.53
Change+$0.37 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets778.74M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.17
Change+$0.43 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.99B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 22B vs. ECEAX (779M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (23 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.63 vs. ECEAX (5.27). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.06 vs. RGWBX (40.67).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.005 | 7.518 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 779M | 22B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.27 | 8.63 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.50 | 36.99 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.06 | 40.67 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.26 | 64.53 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers