Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$35.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets818.56M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.75
Change+$0.15 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.56B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. ECEAX (819M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.76 vs. ECEAX (9.03). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.62 vs. RGWBX (32.83).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.341 | 14.010 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 819M | 23.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 12.76 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.84 | 41.63 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.62 | 32.83 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.47 | 88.17 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement