Ad is loading...
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$31.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.29M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$23.94
Change+$0.15 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.28B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. ECEAX (741M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (23 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). ECEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. RGWBX (2.10). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.06 vs. RGWBX (37.63).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.325 | -2.260 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 741M | 20.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 2.10 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.11 | 18.52 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.06 | 37.63 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.30 | 50.41 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers