Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$32.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets741.29M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.42B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. ECEAX (741M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (23 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX (7.68) and ECEAX (7.34) have marching annual gain over last year. ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.71 vs. RGWBX (39.08).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.213 | 3.164 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 741M | 21.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 7.68 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.46 | 23.98 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.71 | 39.08 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.12 | 58.16 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement