Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$34.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets810.61M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.14B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. ECEAX (811M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (23 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. ECEAX (7.96). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.82 vs. RGWBX (38.88).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.874 | 11.052 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 811M | 23.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 11.19 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.76 | 40.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.82 | 38.88 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.97 | 70.36 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement