ECO vs HOEGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Hold and HOEGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHOEGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HOEGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -9.78% price change this week, while HOEGF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -6.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| ECO | HOEGF | ECO / HOEGF | |
| Capitalization | 724M | 1.49B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 215M | 799M | 27% |
| Gain YTD | 3.293 | -19.000 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.50 | 2.52 | 258% |
| Revenue | 400M | 1.4B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 49.1M | 344M | 14% |
| Total Debt | 657M | 599M | 110% |
| ECO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AILCX | 15.33 | -0.10 | -0.65% |
| American Beacon International Eq C | |||
| SLVYX | 23.99 | -0.35 | -1.44% |
| Saratoga Large Capitalization Value A | |||
| MRGBX | 42.37 | -0.78 | -1.81% |
| MFS Core Equity B | |||
| DCFGX | 34.14 | -0.75 | -2.15% |
| Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth C | |||
| EKBYX | 13.57 | -0.30 | -2.16% |
| Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr Inst | |||
ECO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| NAT - ECO | 67% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| HAFN - ECO | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASC - ECO | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| SFL - ECO | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| BWLP - ECO | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
HOEGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOEGF has been loosely correlated with WAWIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOEGF jumps, then WAWIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HOEGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOEGF | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| WAWIF - HOEGF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ECO - HOEGF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| HAFN - HOEGF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BWLP - HOEGF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
| MPZZF - HOEGF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.96% | ||
More | ||||