ECO
Price
$54.20
Change
-$0.74 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMM
Price
$75.41
Change
-$0.34 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs NMM

ECO vs NMM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NMM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a StrongBuy and NMM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ECO: $54.20 vs. NMM: $75.41)
Brand notoriety: ECO and NMM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 52% vs. NMM: 36%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $2.07B vs. NMM: $2.14B
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.07B. NMM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $2.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNMM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NMM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NMM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMM is a better buy in the short-term than ECO.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

NMM is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.09% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMM($2.14B) and ECO($2.07B) have the same market capitalization . ECO has higher P/E ratio than NMM: ECO (9.53) vs NMM (6.36). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 71.527 vs. NMM (44.065). NMM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 818M vs. ECO (283M). NMM has more cash in the bank: 421M vs. ECO (126M). ECO has less debt than NMM: ECO (683M) vs NMM (1.62B). NMM has higher revenues than ECO: NMM (1.4B) vs ECO (482M).
ECONMMECO / NMM
Capitalization2.07B2.14B97%
EBITDA283M818M35%
Gain YTD71.52744.065162%
P/E Ratio9.536.36150%
Revenue482M1.4B35%
Total Cash126M421M30%
Total Debt683M1.62B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECO vs NMM: Fundamental Ratings
ECO
NMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
635
SMR RATING
1..100
2843
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECO's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMM (52) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMM’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (35) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (43) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.

ECO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (40) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.

NMM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECO (49) in the null industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USL49.182.56
+5.50%
United States 12 Month Oil
NOVM33.85N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF – Nov
USVM108.74N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US Sm Md Cp Val Momt ETF
EDGE50.06-0.15
-0.30%
MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF
FAN23.86-0.18
-0.75%
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-1.35%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
HAFN - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
ASC - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
NMM - ECO
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
SFL - ECO
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

NMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMM
1D Price
Change %
NMM100%
-0.45%
GNK - NMM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
GSL - NMM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
HAFN - NMM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
DAC - NMM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CMRE - NMM
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
More