Advertisement
ECO vs NMM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Hold and NMM is a Hold.
| ECO | NMM | ECO / NMM | |
| Capitalization | 3.22B | 2.69B | 120% |
| EBITDA | 487M | 914M | 53% |
| Gain YTD | 185.245 | 77.497 | 239% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.67 | 6.07 | 126% |
| Revenue | 706M | 1.48B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 223M | 469M | 48% |
| Total Debt | 722M | 1.64B | 44% |
ECO | NMM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECO's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMM (63) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMM’s over the last 12 months.
ECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (21) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
ECO's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (35) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
ECO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NMM (37) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ECO’s stock grew similarly to NMM’s over the last 12 months.
NMM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECO (91) in the null industry. This means that NMM’s stock grew significantly faster than ECO’s over the last 12 months.
| ECO | NMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 53% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while NMM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NMM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NMM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +18.27% price change this week, while NMM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NMM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+1.12% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STPZ | 52.24 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | |||
| PHEQ | 35.18 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| CPHY | 51.23 | -0.11 | -0.22% |
| F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| JULZ | 45.70 | -0.21 | -0.45% |
| Trueshares Structured Outcome July ETF | |||
| FLTW | 102.49 | -0.55 | -0.53% |
| Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | |||
ECO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.
NMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMM | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| GSL - NMM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| HAFN - NMM | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| GNK - NMM | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| DAC - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| CMRE - NMM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||