ECO
Price
$30.19
Change
-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
981.44M
55 days until earnings call
NAT
Price
$3.29
Change
-$0.02 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
698.78M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs NAT

Header iconECO vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NATBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$30.19
Change-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization981.44M
Nordic American Tanker
Price$3.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.60%)
Volume$25.33K
Capitalization698.78M
ECO vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NAT commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a StrongBuy and NAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $30.36 vs. NAT: $3.31)
Brand notoriety: ECO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
ECO represents the Marine Shipping, while NAT is part of the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 119% vs. NAT: 188%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $972.86M vs. NAT: $679.72M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $972.86M. NAT’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $679.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $106.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ECO and NAT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +8.12% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.12%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +5.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.95% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+5.19% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($981M) has a higher market cap than NAT($699M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NAT (47.14) vs ECO (14.44). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 50.245 vs. NAT (43.129). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 155M vs. NAT (43.9M). NAT has less debt than ECO: NAT (340M) vs ECO (631M). ECO has higher revenues than NAT: ECO (344M) vs NAT (301M).
ECONATECO / NAT
Capitalization981M699M140%
EBITDA155M43.9M353%
Gain YTD50.24543.129116%
P/E Ratio14.4447.1431%
Revenue344M301M114%
Total Cash59.8MN/A-
Total Debt631M340M186%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIVHX29.24N/A
N/A
Cutler Equity Fund
TGBLX11.12N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Impact Equity I
PIGFX38.65N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth A
CCWRX9.77N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
SDLAX20.88N/A
N/A
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation A (SIIT)

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-0.56%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
HAFN - ECO
70%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
ASC - ECO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
BWLP - ECO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
NMM - ECO
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
-0.30%
DHT - NAT
81%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
FRO - NAT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
TNK - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
INSW - NAT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
TEN - NAT
76%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More