ECO
Price
$23.60
Change
-$0.26 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
764.79M
32 days until earnings call
NAT
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.06 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
572.1M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECO vs NAT

Header iconECO vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NATBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$23.60
Change-$0.26 (-1.09%)
Volume$298.54K
Capitalization764.79M
Nordic American Tanker
Price$2.74
Change-$0.06 (-2.14%)
Volume$3.35M
Capitalization572.1M
ECO vs NAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NAT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a Hold and NAT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $23.60 vs. NAT: $2.74)
Brand notoriety: ECO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 131% vs. NAT: 116%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $764.79M vs. NAT: $572.1M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $764.79M. NAT’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $572.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the short-term than NAT.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.76% price change this week, while NAT (@Marine Shipping) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

NAT is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($765M) has a higher market cap than NAT($572M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NAT (9.13) vs ECO (6.50). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 11.007 vs. NAT (9.600). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 215M vs. NAT (92.4M). ECO has more cash in the bank: 49.1M vs. NAT (40.5M). NAT has less debt than ECO: NAT (278M) vs ECO (657M). ECO has higher revenues than NAT: ECO (400M) vs NAT (367M).
ECONATECO / NAT
Capitalization765M572M134%
EBITDA215M92.4M233%
Gain YTD11.0079.600115%
P/E Ratio6.509.1371%
Revenue400M367M109%
Total Cash49.1M40.5M121%
Total Debt657M278M236%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPTRX217.723.17
+1.48%
Baron Partners Retail
WSMDX29.000.16
+0.55%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Growth I
WIEFX14.040.01
+0.07%
Boston Trust Walden International Eq
BCSCX8.21N/A
N/A
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Inv C
GDEUX22.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity ESG R6

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
-1.09%
HAFN - ECO
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.24%
NAT - ECO
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
ASC - ECO
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
SFL - ECO
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMRE - ECO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More