ECO
Price
$27.60
Change
+$0.74 (+2.76%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
849.84M
75 days until earnings call
NAT
Price
$3.12
Change
+$0.11 (+3.65%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
658.54M
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECO vs NAT

Header iconECO vs NAT Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NATBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$27.60
Change+$0.74 (+2.76%)
Volume$100
Capitalization849.84M
Nordic American Tanker
Price$3.12
Change+$0.11 (+3.65%)
Volume$18.91K
Capitalization658.54M
ECO vs NAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NAT commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a StrongBuy and NAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $26.86 vs. NAT: $3.01)
Brand notoriety: ECO: Not notable vs. NAT: Notable
ECO represents the Marine Shipping, while NAT is part of the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 78% vs. NAT: 159%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $849.84M vs. NAT: $658.54M
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $849.84M. NAT’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $658.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.48B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAT is a better buy in the short-term than ECO.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.14%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.28% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.38% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECO($850M) has a higher market cap than NAT($659M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NAT (18.29) vs ECO (13.19). ECO YTD gains are higher at: 33.673 vs. NAT (26.558). ECO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 155M vs. NAT (65M). NAT has less debt than ECO: NAT (340M) vs ECO (634M). ECO has higher revenues than NAT: ECO (344M) vs NAT (327M).
ECONATECO / NAT
Capitalization850M659M129%
EBITDA155M65M238%
Gain YTD33.67326.558127%
P/E Ratio13.1918.2972%
Revenue344M327M105%
Total CashN/A103M-
Total Debt634M340M186%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAT: Fundamental Ratings
NAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECONAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCACX26.19N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation C
NQCFX28.70N/A
N/A
NorthQuest Capital
HFCIX53.10N/A
N/A
Hennessy Focus Institutional
SLYCX16.17N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Y (SIMT)
ETLAX15.59N/A
N/A
Eventide Large Cap Focus A

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with NAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then NAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+0.56%
NAT - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
HAFN - ECO
73%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
ASC - ECO
67%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
BWLP - ECO
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
NMM - ECO
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More