ECO
Price
$21.47
Change
+$0.63 (+3.02%)
Updated
Apr 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
658.53M
27 days until earnings call
NMPGY
Price
$5.20
Change
+$0.20 (+4.00%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
13.47B
Ad is loading...

ECO vs NMPGY

Header iconECO vs NMPGY Comparison
Open Charts ECO vs NMPGYBanner chart's image
Okeanis Eco Tankers
Price$21.47
Change+$0.63 (+3.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization658.53M
Navios Maritime Holdings
Price$5.20
Change+$0.20 (+4.00%)
Volume$227
Capitalization13.47B
ECO vs NMPGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECO vs. NMPGY commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECO is a StrongBuy and NMPGY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ECO: $20.84 vs. NMPGY: $5.20)
Brand notoriety: ECO and NMPGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECO: 43% vs. NMPGY: 33%
Market capitalization -- ECO: $658.53M vs. NMPGY: $13.47B
ECO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $658.53M. NMPGY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $13.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMPGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMPGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ECO is a better buy in the long-term than NMPGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ECO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ECO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +3.89% price change this week, while NMPGY (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.95% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMPGY($13.5B) has a higher market cap than ECO($659M). NMPGY has higher P/E ratio than ECO: NMPGY (134.72) vs ECO (6.17). NMPGY YTD gains are higher at: 30.000 vs. ECO (-0.315).
ECONMPGYECO / NMPGY
Capitalization659M13.5B5%
EBITDA215MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.31530.000-1%
P/E Ratio6.17134.725%
Revenue400MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt657MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMPGY: Fundamental Ratings
NMPGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ECO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DALVX18.15N/A
N/A
Dunham Large Cap Value A
EISIX24.35N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock I
HILAX19.30N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value A
NSFJX11.92N/A
N/A
Natixis Target Retirement 2045 N
WOFRX54.78N/A
N/A
Allspring Opportunity R6

ECO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECO has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECO jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECO
1D Price
Change %
ECO100%
+3.32%
HAFN - ECO
72%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
NAT - ECO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
ASC - ECO
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
GNK - ECO
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
SFL - ECO
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
More

NMPGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMPGY has been loosely correlated with NMPRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMPGY jumps, then NMPRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMPGY
1D Price
Change %
NMPGY100%
N/A
NMPRY - NMPGY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CISS - NMPGY
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
TORO - NMPGY
-4%
Poorly correlated
+6.28%
ECO - NMPGY
-8%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
HAFN - NMPGY
-14%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%