ECPG vs MLI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECPG is a Buy and MLI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECPG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ECPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECPG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ECPG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while MLI (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.23%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +3.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
ECPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
MLI is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.95% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Metal Fabrication (+3.55% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| ECPG | MLI | ECPG / MLI | |
| Capitalization | 1.07B | 8.13B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 47.7M | 892M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -27.946 | -7.112 | 393% |
| P/E Ratio | 113.64 | 13.38 | 849% |
| Revenue | 1.22B | 3.92B | 31% |
| Total Cash | 158M | 874M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 3.32B | 32.9M | 10,085% |
ECPG | MLI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MLI's Valuation (44) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECPG (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECPG (71) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's SMR Rating (40) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECPG (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as ECPG (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to ECPG’s over the last 12 months.
ECPG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MLI (29) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that ECPG’s stock grew similarly to MLI’s over the last 12 months.
| ECPG | MLI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 39% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRSK | 32.26 | 0.28 | +0.88% |
| Toews Agility Managed Risk ETF | |||
| IJK | 83.53 | 0.56 | +0.67% |
| iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | |||
| BLLD | 48.77 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | |||
| EMGF | 46.67 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF | |||
| SRTY | 23.45 | -0.49 | -2.05% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | |||
ECPG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECPG has been loosely correlated with PRAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECPG jumps, then PRAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECPG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECPG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| PRAA - ECPG | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| ENVA - ECPG | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| OMF - ECPG | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| HRI - ECPG | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| NAVI - ECPG | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
MLI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLI | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| ESAB - MLI | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| MTUS - MLI | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CRS - MLI | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.44% | ||
| ZEUS - MLI | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| IIIN - MLI | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||