ED
Price
$103.69
Change
-$0.43 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.4B
78 days until earnings call
FTS
Price
$50.52
Change
-$0.13 (-0.26%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
25.49B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs FTS

Header iconED vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts ED vs FTSBanner chart's image
Consolidated Edison
Price$103.69
Change-$0.43 (-0.41%)
Volume$2.58M
Capitalization37.4B
Fortis
Price$50.52
Change-$0.13 (-0.26%)
Volume$428.46K
Capitalization25.49B
ED vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ED vs. FTS commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (ED: $103.69 vs. FTS: $50.52)
Brand notoriety: ED and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 100% vs. FTS: 71%
Market capitalization -- ED: $37.4B vs. FTS: $25.49B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $37.4B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $25.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $147.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ED and FTS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.47% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.50% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($37.4B) has a higher market cap than FTS($25.5B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than ED: FTS (20.44) vs ED (18.85). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 21.530 vs. ED (18.245). FTS (5.78B) and ED (5.66B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . ED has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. FTS (221M). ED has less debt than FTS: ED (26.2B) vs FTS (33.8B). ED has higher revenues than FTS: ED (15.8B) vs FTS (11.9B).
EDFTSED / FTS
Capitalization37.4B25.5B147%
EBITDA5.66B5.78B98%
Gain YTD18.24521.53085%
P/E Ratio18.8520.4492%
Revenue15.8B11.9B133%
Total Cash360M221M163%
Total Debt26.2B33.8B78%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
ED
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1856
SMR RATING
1..100
7677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (65) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (56) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (77) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (46) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XUDV26.190.31
+1.19%
Franklin U.S. Dividend Mltplr Idx ETF
TBFG28.600.27
+0.94%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
CLM8.170.07
+0.86%
Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund
PSMR28.870.08
+0.29%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-0.26%
DUK - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
SO - FTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
AEP - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
BKH - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
ED - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More