ED vs FTS

Key Takeaways

• Both ED and FTS belong to the regulated utility sector and have each raised dividends for over 50 consecutive years, reflecting deeply entrenched income-investor appeal.
• Consolidated Edison operates a concentrated franchise in the New York metropolitan area, while Fortis runs a geographically diversified portfolio spanning five Canadian provinces, ten U.S. states, and the Caribbean.
• ED recently raised its 2026 adjusted earnings per share (EPS) guidance to $6.00–$6.20 and outlined a $38 billion five-year capital plan; FTS unveiled a record $28.8 billion five-year capital plan targeting 7% annual rate base growth.
• Momentum indicators differ: ED has posted a year-to-date share price gain exceeding 13%, while FTS has navigated headwinds from asset dispositions and regulatory lag in certain jurisdictions.
• Analyst sentiment on ED skews neutral-to-cautious with a Hold consensus, while Fortis faces mixed ratings that reflect both its growth runway and lingering regulatory uncertainties.
• For income-focused investors, both stocks present durable dividend profiles, but their risk-and-growth trade-offs diverge markedly due to geographic concentration versus diversification.

Introduction

Regulated electric and gas utilities have long served as cornerstones of defensive portfolios, offering revenue predictability, stable dividends, and inflation-hedging characteristics. Within this space, ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and FTS (Fortis Inc.) represent two distinct approaches to utility investing — one deeply concentrated in America's largest metropolitan market, the other broadly diversified across North America. Both companies have recently released multi-year capital plans, updated earnings guidance, and navigated evolving regulatory environments. This comparison examines how these two utility giants stack up in the current market environment and which might better suit different investor priorities.

ED Overview and Recent Performance

Consolidated Edison, through its primary subsidiary Consolidated Edison Company of New York (CECONY), delivers electricity, natural gas, and steam to approximately 10 million people across New York City, Westchester County, and parts of northern New Jersey. Its subsidiaries also include Orange & Rockland Utilities and Con Edison Transmission. The company reported full-year 2025 adjusted EPS of $5.70, up from $5.40 in 2024, landing at the top end of its guidance range. For 2026, management has guided adjusted EPS to $6.00–$6.20 and projected a five-year compounded annual EPS growth rate of 6% to 7%.

In recent weeks, ED shares have traded near the $111 level, putting the stock roughly 15% higher year-to-date and within sight of its 52-week high of approximately $116. The company reached a Joint Settlement Agreement on a three-year investment plan that, if approved, would fund critical infrastructure modernization while keeping affordability front and center. Landmark electrification projects — including New York's first all-electric skyscraper, a new Queens soccer stadium, and the JFK Airport redevelopment — underscore growing demand for reliable energy in its service territory. The company's beta of 0.26 reinforces its reputation as a low-volatility holding. Analyst ratings remain mixed: UBS rates ED Neutral, Barclays maintains an Underweight rating, and Evercore ISI initiated coverage with In-Line, reflecting cautious optimism tempered by regulatory and rate-case risks.

FTS Overview and Recent Performance

Fortis Inc. is a diversified North American regulated electric and gas utility holding company with approximately $75 billion in total assets and 2025 revenue of $12 billion. Its 9,900 employees serve customers across five Canadian provinces, ten U.S. states, and the Caribbean through ten utility subsidiaries, including ITC Holdings (transmission), UNS Energy (Arizona electric and gas), FortisBC, and Central Hudson. For full-year 2025, Fortis reported adjusted net earnings per common share of $3.53, a 7.6% increase from $3.28 in 2024, driven by rate base growth across its utility portfolio.

Fortis invested $5.6 billion in capital expenditures during 2025, expanding its midyear rate base to $42.4 billion — a 7% increase over 2024. The company also announced a record $28.8 billion five-year capital plan for 2026–2030, $2.8 billion higher than its prior plan, with incremental investments concentrated in transmission expansion at ITC, load-growth projects at Tucson Electric Power (including a data center energy supply agreement for approximately 300 megawatts), and the Springerville Natural Gas Conversion project in Arizona. Fortis marked its 52nd consecutive year of dividend increases in late 2025 and extended its 4%–6% annual dividend growth guidance through 2030. However, recent quarters have been impacted by asset dispositions — including the sale of FortisTCI and its Belize operations — as well as regulatory lag at UNS Energy and milder weather affecting retail electricity sales. The stock has traded within a broad 52-week range, reflecting both ambitious growth plans and lingering regulatory and execution uncertainties.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where utility stocks face shifting interest-rate expectations, evolving regulatory frameworks, and sector rotation pressures, many traders are turning to data-driven tools to identify timely opportunities. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots, chosen from hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only the strongest performers — those best suited to current market conditions — earn a spot in this featured section. These bots employ distinct trading styles, timeframes, and strategies, with some targeting short-term swings and others designed for trend-following in steadier sectors like utilities. Performance statistics vary widely, with certain bots achieving win rates above 70% and generating annualized returns that meaningfully outpace buy-and-hold benchmarks over comparable periods. Whether you are monitoring ED, FTS, or seeking cross-sector signals, exploring this curated lineup can help you identify data-driven approaches aligned with your trading goals.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between these two utility stocks lies in geographic concentration versus diversification. Consolidated Edison's fortunes are overwhelmingly tied to the New York metropolitan economy — one of the world's most productive economic regions but also a jurisdiction with an assertive regulatory body (the New York State Public Service Commission) that can influence rate recovery, allowed returns on equity (ROE), and capital deployment timelines. Fortis, by contrast, operates across 15 jurisdictions, diluting the impact of any single regulatory decision while adding complexity from currency exposure (Canadian dollar versus U.S. dollar) and varying rate-case calendars.

On growth, both companies have laid out ambitious capital plans. ED's $38 billion five-year program and 6%–7% EPS growth target are notable, but the projection depends heavily on rate-case outcomes and New York's clean-energy transition timeline. Fortis's $28.8 billion plan targets 7% rate base growth through 2030, with only 21% tied to major capital projects, underscoring high executability. However, regulatory lag — where infrastructure investments are made before customer rates are adjusted — has weighed on Fortis's UNS Energy segment and may persist in the near term.

From a dividend perspective, both companies boast more than five decades of consecutive annual increases. ED's indicated dividend yield of approximately 3.2% compares favorably with Fortis's yield, though the latter's explicit 4%–6% annual dividend growth guidance through 2030 offers greater forward visibility. ED's lower beta (0.26) reflects its near-pure-play regulated utility profile, while Fortis's broader operational footprint exposes it to a wider spectrum of macroeconomic variables, including foreign exchange fluctuations and regional weather patterns.

Risk factors also differ. ED faces concentration risk — any adverse regulatory ruling in New York or prolonged disruption from severe weather in its coastal service territory could disproportionately affect earnings. Fortis contends with integration complexity across its ten utilities, currency translation risk, and the political sensitivity of rate increases in diverse jurisdictions. On valuation, ED trades at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) around 18x, modestly below the integrated utility peer average. Fortis trades at a similar multiple but carries a larger debt load relative to its market capitalization, which warrants attention in an environment where interest rates remain elevated.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and risk-reward positioning, Tickeron's AI framework would likely tilt in favor of ED in the current environment. Consolidated Edison's concentrated exposure to one of the most economically resilient regions in the United States, combined with clearer near-term EPS growth visibility (6%–7% annually), a recently settled multi-year rate plan, and a beta of just 0.26, presents a profile of steady, trend-following stability. The AI would recognize that Fortis's broader diversification and larger capital plan offer potentially higher long-term total return — but the near-term headwinds from dispositions, regulatory lag in Arizona, and foreign-exchange complexity introduce a wider uncertainty band. In probabilistic terms, the AI would favor ED for its cleaner trend structure and lower-volatility profile, while acknowledging that Fortis may offer greater upside for investors willing to accept additional complexity and a longer time horizon for rate-case outcomes to materialize in earnings.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations