Advertisement
ED vs FTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Fortis (FTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ED and FTS deliver reliable dividends as regulated utilities, attracting income-oriented investors seeking stability.
- FTS has shown stronger one-year total returns of approximately 22%, outperforming ED's 1.4%.
- ED boasts a larger market capitalization (market cap) of about $40 billion compared to FTS's $29 billion.
- Recent market activity indicates stability for both, with year-to-date gains around 10-12% and upcoming first-quarter earnings reports.
- FTS offers broader geographic diversification across Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean, contrasting ED's New York focus.
Introduction
Consolidated Edison (ED) and Fortis (FTS) represent prominent players in the regulated utilities sector, offering essential electric and gas services amid volatile market conditions. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning, providing insights for income investors, dividend seekers, and those prioritizing defensive assets. With interest rate sensitivity and regulatory dynamics influencing utilities, understanding relative strengths in stability, growth, and momentum helps traders evaluate opportunities in this low-volatility sector.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) operates as a holding company delivering electricity, natural gas, and steam primarily to the New York City metropolitan area and surrounding regions. As a regulated utility, it benefits from predictable revenue streams tied to approved rate structures. In recent weeks, ED shares have hovered around $110, posting year-to-date gains of over 12% despite broader market swings. Sentiment has been supported by regulatory rate increase approvals, a quarterly dividend declaration of $0.8875 per share, and anticipation for first-quarter earnings. These factors underscore ED's appeal as a defensive holding with consistent performance.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. (FTS) is an international utility holding company with regulated electric and gas operations spanning Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean. Its diversified portfolio across multiple jurisdictions provides revenue stability through rate-regulated frameworks. Recently, FTS shares have traded near $57, achieving year-to-date advances of about 10% and one-year returns around 22%. Positive momentum stems from analyst upgrades, a new 52-week high in Canadian listings, and preparations for first-quarter results, reinforcing its position as a growth-oriented utility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers selected from 351 AI trading bots that deploy machine learning strategies across thousands of tickers in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots excel in current market conditions, featuring annualized returns ranging from 23% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes vary from 5 minutes to 49 days, with styles including trend-following, volatility plays, and sector-specific signals like semiconductors or data centers. Designed for copy trading with built-in risk management such as take-profit (TP) and stop-loss (SL) levels, they offer diverse approaches for different risk appetites. Explore these high-potential tools to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both ED and FTS operate regulated utility business models, generating stable cash flows from essential services less sensitive to economic cycles. However, FTS edges in growth drivers through its expansive rate base and multi-jurisdictional presence, while ED focuses on dense urban demand in New York. Recent momentum favors FTS with superior one- and ten-year returns (10.4% annualized vs. ED's 7.7%). Risk factors include interest rate exposure for both, but ED faces concentrated regulatory scrutiny in New York, and FTS some currency fluctuation. Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios hover around 23 for both, with comparable dividend yields near 3%. Sector exposure remains aligned in utilities, though FTS shows stronger market sentiment via recent highs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors FTS over ED, driven by consistent trend strength, higher relative returns, and diversified operations positioning it advantageously in the utilities sector. While ED offers robust stability, FTS's momentum suggests a higher probability of outperformance amid ongoing market rotations toward defensives with growth potential.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Buy and FTS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.64% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | FTS | ED / FTS | |
| Capitalization | 39.1B | 28.7B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 5.91B | 107% |
| Gain YTD | 7.777 | 8.260 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.91 | 22.75 | 79% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 12.2B | 141% |
| Total Cash | 147M | 359M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 35.4B | 77% |
ED | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (62) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (58) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's SMR Rating (75) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 9 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FV | 69.78 | 0.88 | +1.27% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | |||
| TBF | 24.53 | 0.14 | +0.55% |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| TOPC | 33.58 | 0.10 | +0.31% |
| iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF | |||
| IBMR | 25.31 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| OAKM | 27.55 | -0.27 | -0.97% |
| Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | |||
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.