Advertisement
ED vs FTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Fortis (FTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ED and FTS operate as regulated utilities with stable cash flows from essential energy services.
- FTS has delivered stronger one-year total returns compared to ED amid broader utility sector interest.
- ED focuses on the New York metropolitan area with electric, gas, and steam delivery, while FTS maintains a diversified North American footprint including Canadian and U.S. operations.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks exhibiting defensive characteristics typical of the utilities sector during periods of economic uncertainty.
- Key differentiators include ED’s larger market capitalization and FTS’s ongoing capital projects supporting long-term growth.
- Market sentiment remains influenced by interest rate expectations and regulatory developments affecting both companies.
Introduction
This comparison examines two established utility stocks, ED and FTS, which provide regulated energy services across North America. Investors and traders seeking defensive exposure within the utilities sector may find this analysis relevant when evaluating relative stability, geographic diversification, and recent performance trends. The review highlights observable differences in business models, market positioning, and momentum to support informed decision-making in the current environment.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is a holding company whose subsidiaries deliver regulated electric, gas, and steam services primarily to customers in New York City and surrounding areas. The company serves millions of electric and gas customers through extensive transmission and distribution infrastructure. In recent weeks, ED has traded in a relatively narrow range consistent with broader utilities sector behavior, reflecting its defensive profile amid fluctuating interest rate outlooks. Performance has been supported by steady demand for essential services and ongoing infrastructure investments, though the stock has shown more modest gains compared to some sector peers over the trailing twelve months.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. (FTS) operates as a diversified regulated utility holding company with assets across Canada and the United States, including electric and gas distribution businesses. The company has advanced major capital projects such as the Tilbury LNG facility while reporting quarterly earnings growth. In recent market activity, FTS has maintained positions near key resistance levels and demonstrated stronger one-year total returns relative to certain peers. Sentiment has been influenced by consistent dividend policies and progress on infrastructure initiatives that support long-term rate base expansion.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library. The platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers, yet only the highest-performing and most suitable options for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and returns varying significantly across the collection. This resource allows users to explore data-driven approaches tailored to individual preferences. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ED and FTS both generate predictable revenues from regulated rate structures, yet differ in scale and geographic reach. ED maintains a concentrated presence in the densely populated New York region with a larger market capitalization, while FTS benefits from broader North American diversification that can mitigate localized regulatory risks. Recent momentum has favored FTS on a one-year total return basis, supported by project execution and earnings growth. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, though ED’s urban infrastructure focus may expose it to different operational and regulatory dynamics than FTS’s multi-jurisdictional operations. Market sentiment for the pair remains tied to sector-wide themes such as capital expenditure needs and macroeconomic stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, geographic diversification, and recent project momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to FTS over ED. The assessment reflects FTS’s stronger trailing returns and ongoing capital initiatives that may support relative positioning, while acknowledging ED’s established scale and defensive characteristics. This evaluation remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+0.24% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | FTS | ED / FTS | |
| Capitalization | 40.1B | 28.8B | 139% |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 5.96B | 107% |
| Gain YTD | 10.286 | 8.240 | 125% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.83 | 23.06 | 77% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 12.4B | 139% |
| Total Cash | 147M | 384M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 36.3B | 75% |
ED | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (32) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (49) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (60) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's SMR Rating (76) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (79) in the null industry. This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 28% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 42% | 11 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 37% |
Advertisement
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with EMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then EMA could also see price increases.