EDC
Price
$85.51
Change
+$7.14 (+9.11%)
Updated
Jul 6, 12:48 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
163.27M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$93.93
Change
+$3.32 (+3.66%)
Updated
Jul 6, 01:12 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDC vs QLD

EDC vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • EDC seeks 3x daily returns of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, providing leveraged exposure to equities across 24 emerging market countries, while QLD targets 2x daily returns of the Nasdaq-100 Index, focusing on large-cap U.S. technology and growth stocks.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged strategies using derivatives such as swaps and futures rather than direct stock ownership, resulting in high volatility and the need for short-term trading horizons.
  • EDC carries a net expense ratio of 1.09%, slightly higher than QLD’s 0.95%, reflecting the complexities of emerging markets leverage.
  • Structural differences include EDC’s broad geographic diversification versus QLD’s concentrated U.S. technology sector exposure, leading to distinct risk profiles and correlation patterns with global markets.
  • EDC suits investors seeking amplified emerging markets beta, whereas QLD appeals to those targeting leveraged U.S. large-cap growth momentum.
  • Neither ETF is designed for long-term buy-and-hold due to compounding effects from daily resets and leverage decay in volatile or sideways markets.

Introduction

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) represent two distinct leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that amplify daily returns of their respective benchmarks. They do not compete directly for the same investor base but instead offer alternative pathways to enhanced equity exposure—one tied to emerging markets and the other to U.S. technology leadership. Investors evaluating these products often compare them when seeking leveraged strategies within broader growth or thematic portfolios, particularly amid shifting global capital flows and sector rotations.

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) Overview

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The fund primarily achieves this objective through total return swaps, futures contracts, and other derivatives rather than holding a large number of individual securities. It maintains a net expense ratio of 1.09%. As a daily-reset product, EDC exhibits significant volatility and is structured for short-term tactical use. Its underlying index covers large- and mid-capitalization equities across 24 emerging market countries, with allocations typically spanning information technology, financials, consumer discretionary, and communication services sectors. Distinguishing features include its use of swap agreements on exchange-traded funds tracking the benchmark, resulting in a compact portfolio dominated by derivative instruments and cash equivalents.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund utilizes financial instruments such as swaps, futures, and options to deliver the targeted leverage. It features a net expense ratio of 0.95%. Like other daily-reset leveraged products, QLD is designed for short-term trading and experiences compounding effects over longer periods. The Nasdaq-100 Index comprises 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq, with heavy weighting toward technology, consumer services, and communication services. Top exposures typically include leading U.S. technology firms. The ETF’s structure emphasizes efficient leverage on U.S. large-cap growth equities, distinguishing it through its focus on innovation-driven sectors and established liquidity in derivatives markets.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader environment for these ETFs encompasses divergent macroeconomic drivers. Emerging markets face influences from commodity price trends, U.S. dollar movements, interest rate differentials, and country-specific regulatory developments in Asia and Latin America. In contrast, the Nasdaq-100 benefits from U.S. corporate earnings growth, technological innovation cycles, and capital allocation toward artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure. Sector rotation between growth-oriented U.S. equities and value or cyclical exposure in emerging economies continues to shape relative performance. Capital flows into technology have supported U.S. large-cap momentum, while emerging markets contend with geopolitical risks and varying monetary policies across constituent nations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, leveraged emerging markets exposure via EDC has shown sensitivity to global risk sentiment and currency fluctuations, often amplifying moves in broad equity indices during periods of improving or deteriorating international trade conditions. QLD has demonstrated pronounced responses to U.S. technology earnings seasons and shifts in growth stock valuations. Relative positioning highlights EDC’s higher potential beta to global diversification themes versus QLD’s concentrated alignment with domestic innovation leadership. Volatility differences arise from geographic breadth in EDC compared with sector concentration in QLD, influencing how each responds to interest rate expectations and macroeconomic data releases over multi-week horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Access the platform to explore data-driven opportunities across leveraged and thematic ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and alignment with prevailing sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) for investors seeking leveraged U.S. growth exposure, owing to its lower expense ratio and concentrated positioning in high-momentum technology equities. Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) may appeal more in environments favoring broad emerging markets recovery. This assessment reflects relative positioning rather than a definitive recommendation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EDC vs. QLD commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDC is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.7B vs. EDC (163M). EDC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: EDC (45.141) vs QLD (28.802). EDC was incepted earlier than QLD: EDC (18 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than EDC (1.09). EDC has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
EDCQLDEDC / QLD
Gain YTD45.14128.802157%
Net Assets163M13.7B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.090.95115%
Turnover347.0016.002,169%
Yield1.200.12998%
Fund Existence18 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDCQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOTI34.070.57
+1.70%
VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF
XOEX40.750.34
+0.83%
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
XOP154.640.89
+0.58%
SttStrtSPDRS&POil&GasExplor&ProdtnETF
HCRB34.970.06
+0.16%
Hartford Core Bond ETF
MULL35.26N/A
N/A
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-3.50%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-4.00%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.11%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
PLTR - QLD
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
CSCO - QLD
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
More