EDC
Price
$85.12
Change
+$4.48 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
194.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$90.68
Change
+$0.30 (+0.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
14.23B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EDC vs QLD

EDC vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF (EDC) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • EDC delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, providing amplified returns from emerging market equities across Asia, Latin America, and other regions.
  • QLD offers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, concentrating on large-cap U.S. technology and growth-oriented companies.
  • Both ETFs employ derivatives for leverage and reset daily, resulting in higher expense ratios (EDC at 1.09%, QLD at 0.95%) compared to unleveraged equity funds.
  • EDC features broader geographic diversification with significant allocations to Taiwan, South Korea, and China, while QLD maintains heavy concentration in U.S. technology sectors.
  • Structural differences position EDC for emerging markets thematic bets and QLD for Nasdaq-100 momentum, with distinct volatility profiles tied to their underlying benchmarks.
  • Investors should note that both products suit short-term tactical use due to compounding effects from daily resets and elevated costs.

Introduction

EDC and QLD represent distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified exposure within equity markets. EDC targets emerging markets through 3x daily leverage on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while QLD provides 2x daily leverage on the Nasdaq-100 Index. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative leveraged approaches for investors pursuing growth themes—one focused on global emerging economies and the other on U.S. large-cap technology leaders. The comparison highlights differences in geographic reach, sector concentration, leverage magnitude, and cost structures relevant to current market conditions involving technology innovation and emerging market dynamics.

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF (EDC) Overview

EDC seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The fund uses swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its 3x leverage target. It maintains a limited number of direct holdings, primarily cash equivalents and exchange-traded funds that facilitate exposure. Key country allocations in the underlying index include Taiwan, South Korea, and China. Prominent index constituents feature companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Samsung Electronics, and SK Hynix. Sector weights emphasize technology and financial services. The net expense ratio stands at 1.09%. As a passive, leveraged product from Direxion, EDC resets exposure daily and suits tactical positioning rather than long-term holding.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund utilizes swaps, futures, and other financial instruments to deliver its 2x leverage. It holds approximately 112 to 128 positions, including cash instruments, money market ETFs, and direct equity exposure to Nasdaq-100 constituents. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Amazon.com Inc. Sector allocation concentrates heavily in information technology, followed by communication services and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio is 0.95%. Issued by ProShares, QLD operates as a passive leveraged vehicle with daily resets designed for short-term trading strategies aligned with Nasdaq-100 movements.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within leveraged equity segments influenced by technology innovation, global trade dynamics, and monetary policy expectations. Emerging markets face catalysts such as supply-chain shifts and regional economic growth, alongside risks from geopolitical tensions and currency fluctuations. The Nasdaq-100 benefits from advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure, tempered by valuation concerns and interest-rate sensitivity. Capital flows into technology themes and emerging market equities reflect broader investor positioning amid evolving macroeconomic conditions. Regulatory developments in major economies and commodity price trends further shape the environment for these leveraged products.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, EDC has reflected amplified movements in emerging market equities, with performance driven by technology and financial sector rotations in Asia. QLD has exhibited volatility aligned with Nasdaq-100 constituents, particularly during earnings seasons for major technology firms. EDC's higher leverage amplifies exposure to emerging market swings, while QLD's 2x structure provides moderated amplification within a concentrated U.S. growth universe. Relative positioning favors EDC for investors anticipating emerging market recovery and QLD for those targeting sustained technology momentum. Both demonstrate elevated volatility compared to unleveraged benchmarks due to daily reset mechanics and leverage factors.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, QLD may currently receive a modest edge in Tickeron AI analysis due to its lower expense ratio, larger asset base supporting liquidity, and alignment with persistent technology sector momentum. EDC offers compelling diversification through emerging markets but carries higher costs and greater sensitivity to regional economic variables. The assessment remains probabilistic and centers on observable factors including cost efficiency, diversification profile, and thematic consistency.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
EDC vs. QLD commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDC is a Hold and QLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 14.2B vs. EDC (194M). EDC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: EDC (57.642) vs QLD (28.902). EDC was incepted earlier than QLD: EDC (18 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than EDC (1.09). EDC has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
EDCQLDEDC / QLD
Gain YTD57.64228.902199%
Net Assets194M14.2B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.090.95115%
Turnover347.0023.001,509%
Yield1.350.131,045%
Fund Existence18 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDCQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOTZ35.950.14
+0.39%
Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF
IQI9.950.01
+0.10%
INVESCO QUALITY Municipal SECURITIES
TSYW41.110.04
+0.10%
Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF
SLDR49.580.01
+0.02%
Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF
ONOF41.12-0.14
-0.34%
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF