Advertisement
EDUC vs TNMG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EDUC is a Hold and TNMG is a Hold.
EDUC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EDUC | TNMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 15% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 29% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EDUC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TNMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EDUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TNMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EDUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EDUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TNMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EDUC (@Publishing: Newspapers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNMG (@Publishing: Newspapers) price change was -16.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Newspapers industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
EDUC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Newspapers (+0.32% weekly)The newspaper publishing industry includes companies that publish and market news journals and daily/weekly newspapers. News Corporation, New York Times Company, and Gannett Co., Inc. are some of the largest newspaper publishers. Commercial ad revenue helps to cover plant and equipment costs and general and administrative expense. The popularity and distribution network of newspaper publishers could affect the fees they can charge on advertisements. In recent decades, with digital content grabbing advertising dollars, long-standing publishing companies have increasingly diversified into creating their own web-based content to stay in business.
Advertisement
EDUC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDUC and TDAY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDUC and TDAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDUC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDUC | 100% | N/A | ||
| TDAY - EDUC | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| LEE - EDUC | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.73% | ||
| RELX - EDUC | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| TNMG - EDUC | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
| SCHL - EDUC | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||
TNMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNMG and EDUC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNMG and EDUC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNMG | 100% | -2.66% | ||
| EDUC - TNMG | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LEE - TNMG | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.73% | ||
| NYT - TNMG | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| WLYB - TNMG | 3% Poorly correlated | +7.70% | ||
| SCHL - TNMG | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||