Investors seeking short-term tactical exposure to declining markets often turn to inverse leveraged ETFs. EDZ and SOXS do not compete directly but represent distinct bearish strategies within the same product family. EDZ targets broad emerging-market equity weakness, while SOXS focuses on semiconductor sector declines. Comparing them helps investors understand how thematic versus geographic exposure influences risk, cost, and positioning in volatile market cycles.
EDZ seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The index is a free float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted benchmark covering large- and mid-cap securities across 24 emerging-market countries. The fund typically holds a small number of positions (around six), primarily swap agreements and other derivatives rather than direct equity holdings. Its net expense ratio stands at approximately 1.05%. As a non-diversified, passively managed inverse leveraged product, EDZ resets daily and amplifies both gains and losses in emerging-market equities.
SOXS seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the ICE Semiconductor Index (or NYSE Semiconductor Index). The benchmark tracks the performance of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. The fund maintains roughly 13 holdings, consisting mainly of derivatives and short positions. Its net expense ratio is 1.00%. Like EDZ, it is a non-diversified, passively managed inverse leveraged ETF with daily reset mechanics, delivering concentrated short exposure to the semiconductor industry.
Emerging-market equities and semiconductor manufacturers respond to overlapping yet distinct macroeconomic forces. Emerging markets are influenced by global trade flows, commodity prices, interest-rate differentials, and currency movements in developing economies. Semiconductors face cyclical demand tied to technology spending, artificial-intelligence adoption, supply-chain constraints, and geopolitical tensions affecting chip production. Both sectors have experienced elevated volatility in recent market cycles due to shifting monetary-policy expectations and trade-policy developments. Inverse leveraged products in these areas attract investors seeking short-term hedges or tactical bearish bets during periods of sector or regional weakness.
In recent weeks and months, both funds have exhibited the high volatility characteristic of -3x daily-reset products. EDZ performance has tracked broader emerging-market equity movements, with amplified reactions to shifts in global growth sentiment and currency trends. SOXS has shown sharper swings tied to semiconductor earnings cycles, technology spending patterns, and chip-demand fluctuations. Relative positioning favors EDZ for diversified geographic short exposure and SOXS for concentrated sector-specific bearish views. Compounding effects from daily resets remain a key differentiator in longer holding periods within recent market cycles.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to EDZ for investors seeking broader geographic diversification within an inverse leveraged framework. Its exposure to a wide array of emerging-market equities offers a more balanced risk profile compared with SOXS’s narrow semiconductor focus, though both carry substantial volatility and daily-reset risks. Final selection depends on an investor’s specific market outlook and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| EDZ | SOXS | EDZ / SOXS | |
| Gain YTD | -59.181 | -92.863 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 20.3M | 1.56B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.00 | 105% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Yield | 7.94 | 46.24 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| EDZ | SOXS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISUL | 13.56 | 0.61 | +4.73% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF | |||
| UFEB | 39.45 | 0.19 | +0.47% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| RSPH | 36.08 | 0.16 | +0.45% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF | |||
| SCHA | 33.79 | 0.14 | +0.42% |
| Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™ | |||
| LQDB | 83.59 | -0.04 | -0.05% |
| iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||