| EEM | EMGF | EEM / EMGF | |
| Gain YTD | 19.407 | 20.854 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 29.2B | 1.86B | 1,574% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.26 | 277% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 20.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 1.97 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| EEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SROI | 36.82 | 0.24 | +0.64% |
| Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF | |||
| NMBL | 20.49 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF | |||
| AFMC | 40.62 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| PDEC | 46.12 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Innovator U.S. Eq Power Buffer ETF - Dec | |||
| AAPW | 42.26 | -0.21 | -0.50% |
| Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMGF has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMGF jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMGF | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| BABA - EMGF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| BZ - EMGF | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| NOAH - EMGF | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEL - EMGF | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CLS - EMGF | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||