Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FDEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Price$49.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
Volume$51.74K
Net Assets18.68B
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$28.40
Change-$0.12 (-0.42%)
Volume$281
Net Assets197.56M
EEM vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FDEM commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Buy and FDEM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 18.7B vs. FDEM (198M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than FDEM: EEM (18.762) vs FDEM (15.142). EEM was incepted earlier than FDEM: EEM (22 years) vs FDEM (6 years). FDEM (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). FDEM has a higher turnover EEM (13.00) vs EEM (13.00).
| EEM | FDEM | EEM / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 18.762 | 15.142 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 198M | 9,444% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.25 | 288% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 65.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 3.77 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||