Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EEM vs FDEM
EEM vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEM vs. FDEM commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEM is a Hold and FDEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EEM has more net assets: 29.1B vs. FDEM (582M). EEM has a higher annual dividend yield than FDEM: EEM (21.685) vs FDEM (17.486). EEM was incepted earlier than FDEM: EEM (23 years) vs FDEM (7 years). FDEM (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EEM (0.72). FDEM has a higher turnover EEM (8.00) vs EEM (8.00).
| EEM | FDEM | EEM / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 21.685 | 17.486 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 29.1B | 582M | 5,000% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.25 | 288% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 76.00 | 11% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 2.97 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EEM | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +11.05% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with Q. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then Q could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| Q - FDEM | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 47% Loosely correlated | +6.80% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||