| EEM | FRDM | EEM / FRDM | |
| Gain YTD | 23.449 | 41.226 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 29.6B | 3.57B | 830% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.49 | 147% |
| Turnover | 8.00 | 19.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 1.77 | 1.55 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| EEM | FRDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 24 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ONDU | 4.74 | 0.09 | +1.94% |
| Tradr 2X Long ONDS Daily ETF | |||
| GRPM | 129.47 | 2.19 | +1.72% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
| CPRY | 27.94 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
| XME | 108.01 | -0.73 | -0.67% |
| Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Mtls &MngETF | |||
| BITI | 28.53 | -0.24 | -0.83% |
| ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRDM has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRDM jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRDM | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| TSM - FRDM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| GGB - FRDM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| LTM - FRDM | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| TEL - FRDM | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| CX - FRDM | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||