Intraday BUY SELL Signals
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRDM vs LTM
FRDM vs LTM Comparison
Open Charts FRDM vs LTM
FRDM vs LTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRDM vs. LTM commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRDM is a Buy and LTM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTM: Fundamental Ratings
LTM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FRDM | LTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLCH | 22.68 | 0.57 | +2.58% |
| Franklin FTSE China ETF | |||
| PDP | 144.63 | 2.54 | +1.79% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
| QQQH | 56.45 | 0.10 | +0.18% |
| NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF | |||
| SEPP | 32.40 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Sep | |||
| OILD | 40.95 | -1.37 | -3.24% |
| MicroSectorsTM Ol&Gs E&P -3X Inv Lg ETNs | |||
FRDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRDM has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRDM jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRDM | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| TSM - FRDM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| LTM - FRDM | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| ITUB - FRDM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| GGB - FRDM | 62% Loosely correlated | +7.24% | ||
| BBD - FRDM | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
LTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTM has been closely correlated with CPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTM jumps, then CPA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | 100% | -2.00% | ||
| CPA - LTM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| RYAAY - LTM | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| ALK - LTM | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| UAL - LTM | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| SKYW - LTM | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||