Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EEMAX vs RNWFX
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EEMAX vs RNWFX
Columbia Emerging Markets A
Price$16.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets753.02M
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.58
Change+$0.35 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.88B
EEMAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EEMAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EEMAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EEMAX (753M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EEMAX: RNWFX (0.95) vs EEMAX (0.82). EEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EEMAX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EEMAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EEMAX: RNWFX (250) vs EEMAX (2000). EEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. RNWFX (21.27). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.72 vs. EEMAX (-5.05).
| EEMAX | RNWFX | EEMAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.62 | 231% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.62 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.533 | 26.301 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753M | 74.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 21.27 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.97 | 48.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.05 | 20.72 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.90 | 94.77 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement