NG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EFAD | NG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EFAD and CAR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EFAD and CAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAD | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| CAR - EFAD | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| BA - EFAD | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| NEM - EFAD | 10% Poorly correlated | +7.85% | ||
| APA - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| NG - EFAD | 9% Poorly correlated | +14.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been closely correlated with CGAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NG jumps, then CGAU could also see price increases.