Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EFCAX vs RGACX
EFCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EFCAX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
EFCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EFCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. EFCAX (18.6M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EFCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs EFCAX (0.00). EFCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EFCAX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EFCAX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EFCAX: RGACX (250) vs EFCAX (2000). EFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.86 vs. RGACX (21.05). EFCAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.22 vs. RGACX (40.21).
| EFCAX | RGACX | EFCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.94 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.94 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.498 | 12.238 | 127% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.86 | 21.05 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.58 | 43.84 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.22 | 40.21 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.09 | 80.13 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement