| EFG | IPOS | EFG / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.771 | 31.222 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 4.72M | 194,559% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.80 | 45% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 81.00 | 28% |
| Yield | 1.53 | 0.94 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| EFG | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and THG have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and THG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.41% | ||
| CRC - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| LSPD - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| EQT - IPOS | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||