| EFG | IPOS | EFG / IPOS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.967 | 55.217 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 13.3M | 127,068% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.80 | 43% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 68.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.34 | 0.71 | 331% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| EFG | IPOS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFG has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFG jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPOS and ARIS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPOS and ARIS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOS | 100% | +1.85% | ||
| ARIS - IPOS | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| SPG - IPOS | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| THG - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
| OR - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| ONT - IPOS | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.12% | ||
More | ||||