EFSC
Price
$59.47
Change
+$0.06 (+0.10%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.21B
40 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$54.68
Change
+$0.35 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.1B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs WSFS

Header iconEFSC vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts EFSC vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$59.47
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
Volume$3.8K
Capitalization2.21B
WSFS Financial
Price$54.68
Change+$0.35 (+0.64%)
Volume$11.44K
Capitalization3.1B
EFSC vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. WSFS commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a Hold and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EFSC: $59.41 vs. WSFS: $54.33)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 89% vs. WSFS: 175%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.21B vs. WSFS: $3.1B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.21B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EFSC and WSFS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($3.1B) has a higher market cap than EFSC($2.21B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: WSFS (11.91) vs EFSC (11.29). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 7.058 vs. WSFS (3.171). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. EFSC (253M). WSFS has less debt than EFSC: WSFS (303M) vs EFSC (661M). WSFS has higher revenues than EFSC: WSFS (1.05B) vs EFSC (552M).
EFSCWSFSEFSC / WSFS
Capitalization2.21B3.1B71%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.0583.171223%
P/E Ratio11.2911.9195%
Revenue552M1.05B52%
Total Cash253M1.02B25%
Total Debt661M303M218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5453
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3041
SMR RATING
1..100
1514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSFS's Valuation (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWGCX13.390.11
+0.83%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc C
PLXGX23.34N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Capital Growth I
VIHAX41.48N/A
N/A
Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Adm
HAISX17.02N/A
N/A
Harbor International Small Cap Instl
MSHOX14.87N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C