EFV | TLTD | EFV / TLTD | |
Gain YTD | 8.424 | 6.671 | 126% |
Net Assets | 21B | 460M | 4,565% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 22.00 | 22.00 | 100% |
Yield | 4.18 | 3.25 | 129% |
Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
EFV | TLTD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago83% | 5 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago81% | 20 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLTD has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLTD jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TLTD | 100% | -0.75% | ||
ASML - TLTD | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
SAP - TLTD | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
SHEL - TLTD | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
TTE - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
MC - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More |