| EFV | TLTD | EFV / TLTD | |
| Gain YTD | 18.313 | 14.087 | 130% |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 687M | 4,600% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.39 | 79% |
| Turnover | 3.90 | 13.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 4.47 | 3.18 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| EFV | TLTD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLTD has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLTD jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLTD | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| ASML - TLTD | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| SAP - TLTD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SHEL - TLTD | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| TTE - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| MC - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||