| EFV | TLTD | EFV / TLTD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.916 | 8.505 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 24.5B | 655M | 3,740% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.39 | 79% |
| Turnover | 3.90 | 13.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 4.78 | 3.41 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| EFV | TLTD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLTD has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLTD jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLTD | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| ASML - TLTD | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SAP - TLTD | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| SHEL - TLTD | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| TTE - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| MC - TLTD | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
More | ||||