Advertisement
EGHSF vs S
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EGHSF is a Hold and S is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EGHSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EGHSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EGHSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EGHSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EGHSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.39% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.47% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+2.22% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| EGHSF | S | EGHSF / S | |
| Capitalization | 889M | 5.59B | 16% |
| EBITDA | 141M | -240.23M | -59% |
| Gain YTD | -14.857 | -24.324 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 505M | 864M | 58% |
| Total Cash | 264M | 767M | 34% |
| Total Debt | 10.8M | 12.6M | 86% |
EGHSF | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EGHSF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for S (79) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that EGHSF’s stock grew significantly faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as EGHSF (100) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to EGHSF’s over the last 12 months.
EGHSF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that EGHSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
EGHSF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as S (85) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that EGHSF’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for EGHSF (79) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than EGHSF’s over the last 12 months.
| EGHSF | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
EGHSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EGHSF and WK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EGHSF and WK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EGHSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGHSF | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| WK - EGHSF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| S - EGHSF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| AMPL - EGHSF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| RPD - EGHSF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
| DUOT - EGHSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||