EICA
Price
$24.60
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jul 25, 03:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
PFLT
Price
$10.69
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
690.23M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EICA vs PFLT

Header iconEICA vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts EICA vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Eagle Point Income
Price$24.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$10.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$5.84K
Capitalization690.23M
EICA vs PFLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EICA vs. PFLT commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICA is a Hold and PFLT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EICA: $24.62 vs. PFLT: $10.71)
Brand notoriety: EICA and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EICA: 87% vs. PFLT: 66%
Market capitalization -- EICA: $0 vs. PFLT: $690.23M
EICA [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EICA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EICA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLT is a better buy in the long-term than EICA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EICA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EICA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EICA is a better buy in the short-term than PFLT.

Price Growth

EICA (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

EICA is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.65% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EICA YTD gains are higher at: 6.878 vs. PFLT (4.906). PFLT has higher revenues than EICA: PFLT (65.9M) vs EICA (33.1M).
EICAPFLTEICA / PFLT
CapitalizationN/A690M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.8784.906140%
P/E RatioN/A9.41-
Revenue33.1M65.9M50%
Total CashN/A15.1M-
Total DebtN/A671M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EICAPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EICA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTCIX25.42N/A
N/A
Hennessy Technology Institutional
VSFCX21.43N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value C
POLIX48.82N/A
N/A
Polen Growth Institutional
FIICX17.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II C
MNECX20.33N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term L

EICA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EICA has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EICA jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EICA
1D Price
Change %
EICA100%
+0.14%
EICB - EICA
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OXLCO - EICA
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCIA - EICA
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
OXLCN - EICA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
PFLT - EICA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with GBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then GBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
N/A
GBDC - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
FSK - PFLT
77%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
CSWC - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
FDUS - PFLT
76%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
NMFC - PFLT
75%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
More