Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FGADX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. EKWCX (1.2B). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FGADX (9.06) vs EKWCX (0.46). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FGADX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.74 vs. EKWCX (50.83). EKWCX (148.97) and FGADX (142.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FGADX | EKWCX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.62 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.228 | -3.770 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 3.06B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 9.06 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.83 | 64.74 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 191.36 | 237.33 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 148.97 | 142.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 232.60 | 291.42 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers