Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FGADX
EKWCX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FGADX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. EKWCX (1.36B). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FGADX (8.48) vs EKWCX (0.42). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWCX (29 years) vs FGADX (30 years). EKWCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWCX (8.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FGADX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.45 vs. EKWCX (41.84). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 256.88 vs. FGADX (240.03).
| EKWCX | FGADX | EKWCX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.62 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.62 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.253 | 13.342 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 3.49B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 8.48 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.84 | 53.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 281.46 | 334.88 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.88 | 240.03 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.11 | 327.06 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers