Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FKRCX
EKWCX vs FKRCX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FKRCX
EKWCX vs FKRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FKRCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FKRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. EKWCX (1.36B). FKRCX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FKRCX (9.31) vs EKWCX (0.42). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FKRCX: EKWCX (29 years) vs FKRCX (57 years). EKWCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). FKRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWCX (8.00). EKWCX (1000) and FKRCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.12 vs. EKWCX (41.84). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 256.88 vs. FKRCX (235.87).
| EKWCX | FKRCX | EKWCX / FKRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.87 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.87 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 57 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.253 | 13.156 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 3.49B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 9.31 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.84 | 53.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 281.46 | 331.80 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.88 | 235.87 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.11 | 317.20 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement