ELA
Price
$6.57
Change
+$0.14 (+2.18%)
Updated
Apr 24, 01:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
121.74M
6 days until earnings call
FOSL
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.54M
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ELA vs FOSL

Header iconELA vs FOSL Comparison
Open Charts ELA vs FOSLBanner chart's image
Envela
Price$6.57
Change+$0.14 (+2.18%)
Volume$201
Capitalization121.74M
Fossil Group
Price$0.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization53.54M
ELA vs FOSL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELA vs. FOSL commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELA is a StrongBuy and FOSL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (ELA: $6.43)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • ELA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOSL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FOSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELA is a better buy in the short-term than FOSL.

Price Growth

ELA (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +6.99% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.76% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELA($122M) has a higher market cap than FOSL($53.5M). FOSL has higher P/E ratio than ELA: FOSL (22.78) vs ELA (16.89). ELA YTD gains are higher at: -10.446 vs. FOSL (-45.329). ELA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.8M vs. FOSL (-115.26M). FOSL has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. ELA (17.9M). ELA has less debt than FOSL: ELA (19.3M) vs FOSL (389M). FOSL has higher revenues than ELA: FOSL (1.41B) vs ELA (172M).
ELAFOSLELA / FOSL
Capitalization122M53.5M228%
EBITDA10.8M-115.26M-9%
Gain YTD-10.446-45.32923%
P/E Ratio16.8922.7874%
Revenue172M1.41B12%
Total Cash17.9M117M15%
Total Debt19.3M389M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELA vs FOSL: Fundamental Ratings
ELA
FOSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3153
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
5994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELA's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (92) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

ELA's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

ELA's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (94) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

ELA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (65) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

ELA's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELAFOSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ELA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COHU15.600.88
+5.98%
Cohu
RBOT5.510.18
+3.38%
Vicarious Surgical
VSTM7.120.08
+1.14%
Verastem
TRNO56.940.14
+0.25%
Terreno Realty Corp
PBR11.47-0.02
-0.17%
Petroleo Brasileiro Sa-Petrobras ADS (REP 1 Common Share)

ELA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELA and LVMHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELA and LVMHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELA
1D Price
Change %
ELA100%
+2.23%
LVMHF - ELA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
BURBY - ELA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
LVMUY - ELA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
CFRUY - ELA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
HESAY - ELA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

FOSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOSL
1D Price
Change %
FOSL100%
+1.87%
MOV - FOSL
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
SIG - FOSL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
TPR - FOSL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
ELA - FOSL
19%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
LANV - FOSL
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More