ELA vs FOSL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELA is a Hold and FOSL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- ELA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOSL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- FOSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ELA (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -8.66% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.76% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| ELA | FOSL | ELA / FOSL | |
| Capitalization | 122M | 53.5M | 228% |
| EBITDA | 10.8M | -115.26M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | -14.763 | -44.563 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.89 | 22.78 | 74% |
| Revenue | 172M | 1.41B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 17.9M | 117M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 19.3M | 389M | 5% |
ELA | FOSL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELA's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (92) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (94) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FOSL (65) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
ELA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that ELA’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.
| ELA | FOSL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 20 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 83% |
ELA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ELA and LVMHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELA and LVMHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELA | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| LVMHF - ELA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| BURBY - ELA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| LVMUY - ELA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CFRUY - ELA | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| HESAY - ELA | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
FOSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| MOV - FOSL | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| SIG - FOSL | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| TPR - FOSL | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| ELA - FOSL | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| LANV - FOSL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||