Advertisement
ELAN vs SUPN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELAN is a Buy and SUPN is a StrongBuy.
ELAN | SUPN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUPN's Valuation (69) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as ELAN (92) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SUPN’s stock grew similarly to ELAN’s over the last 12 months.
SUPN's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELAN (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SUPN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELAN’s over the last 12 months.
ELAN's SMR Rating (92) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SUPN (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ELAN’s stock grew similarly to SUPN’s over the last 12 months.
ELAN's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SUPN (71) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ELAN’s stock grew similarly to SUPN’s over the last 12 months.
ELAN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUPN (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that ELAN’s stock grew significantly faster than SUPN’s over the last 12 months.
| ELAN | SUPN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SUPN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ELAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SUPN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELAN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SUPN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ELAN (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while SUPN (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +4.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
ELAN is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
SUPN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-0.30% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DTD | 94.09 | -0.10 | -0.11% |
| WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) | |||
| KMAR | 31.73 | -0.10 | -0.32% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR) | |||
| RGLO | 33.39 | -0.20 | -0.58% |
| Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) | |||
| SAWG | 24.57 | -0.17 | -0.68% |
| AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) | |||
| NMT | 10.23 | -0.14 | -1.35% |
| Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
ELAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELAN has been loosely correlated with PAHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELAN jumps, then PAHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELAN | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| PAHC - ELAN | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| ZTS - ELAN | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SNDL - ELAN | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| PRGO - ELAN | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| SUPN - ELAN | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.55% | ||
More | ||||
SUPN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPN has been loosely correlated with PRGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUPN jumps, then PRGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPN | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| PRGO - SUPN | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| INDV - SUPN | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| ELAN - SUPN | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| ANIP - SUPN | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| EVO - SUPN | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
More | ||||