It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ELV (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -6.04% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +10.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.41%.
ELV is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
ELV | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELV | HYLG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago54% | 22 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 9 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELV has been closely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELV jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYLG has been loosely correlated with ABBV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYLG jumps, then ABBV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HYLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HYLG | 100% | N/A | ||
ABBV - HYLG | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
TMO - HYLG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
ELV - HYLG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
IDXX - HYLG | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
JNJ - HYLG | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More |