EM
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.03 (-2.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
342.36M
ONVC
Price
$2.16
Change
+$0.14 (+6.93%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EM vs ONVC

Header iconEM vs ONVC Comparison
Open Charts EM vs ONVCBanner chart's image
Smart Share Global
Price$1.35
Change-$0.03 (-2.17%)
Volume$340.95K
Capitalization342.36M
Online Vacation Center Holdings
Price$2.16
Change+$0.14 (+6.93%)
Volume$500
Capitalization16.4M
EM vs ONVC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EM vs. ONVC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a StrongBuy and ONVC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EM: $1.35 vs. ONVC: $2.16)
Brand notoriety: EM and ONVC are both not notable
EM represents the Personnel Services, while ONVC is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EM: 35% vs. ONVC: 68%
Market capitalization -- EM: $342.36M vs. ONVC: $16.4M
EM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $342.36M. ONVC’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $16.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONVC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONVC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the long-term than EM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONVC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONVC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the short-term than EM.

Price Growth

EM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while ONVC (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EM($342M) has a higher market cap than ONVC($16.4M). EM has higher P/E ratio than ONVC: EM (64.39) vs ONVC (17.85). EM YTD gains are higher at: 87.500 vs. ONVC (32.923).
EMONVCEM / ONVC
Capitalization342M16.4M2,085%
EBITDA101MN/A-
Gain YTD87.50032.923266%
P/E Ratio64.3917.85361%
Revenue1.96BN/A-
Total Cash3.04BN/A-
Total Debt10.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONVC: Fundamental Ratings
ONVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
31
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMONVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOGO1.830.07
+3.98%
Mogo
LOVE20.410.40
+2.00%
Lovesac Company (The)
PG160.020.83
+0.52%
Procter & Gamble Company
ARRY8.97-0.12
-1.32%
Array Technologies
IESC349.64-9.50
-2.65%
IES Holdings

ONVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONVC and MNLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONVC and MNLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVC
1D Price
Change %
ONVC100%
N/A
MNLXF - ONVC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - ONVC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRP - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
TCOM - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
EM - ONVC
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
More