EM
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
ONVC
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EM vs ONVC

Header iconEM vs ONVC Comparison
Open Charts EM vs ONVCBanner chart's image
Smart Share Global
Price$0.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$148
CapitalizationN/A
Online Vacation Center Holdings
Price$1.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EM vs ONVC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
EM vs. ONVC commentary
Nov 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a StrongSell and ONVC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 05, 2024
Stock price -- (EM: $0.71 vs. ONVC: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: EM and ONVC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EM: 52% vs. ONVC: 22%
Market capitalization -- EM: $161.66M vs. ONVC: $11.39M
EM [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $161.66M. ONVC’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $11.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONVC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONVC is a better buy in the long-term than EM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

EM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -5.33% price change this week, while ONVC (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -14.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONVC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-0.75% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EM($162M) has a higher market cap than ONVC($11.4M). ONVC has higher P/E ratio than EM: ONVC (12.38) vs EM (11.48). ONVC YTD gains are higher at: 93.333 vs. EM (45.734). ONVC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.81M vs. EM (-262M). EM has more cash in the bank: 3.13B vs. ONVC (7.62M). ONVC has less debt than EM: ONVC (4.85M) vs EM (16.8M). EM has higher revenues than ONVC: EM (3.27B) vs ONVC (17M).
EMONVCEM / ONVC
Capitalization162M11.4M1,421%
EBITDA-262M2.81M-9,314%
Gain YTD45.73493.33349%
P/E Ratio11.4812.3893%
Revenue3.27B17M19,229%
Total Cash3.13B7.62M41,026%
Total Debt16.8M4.85M346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONVC: Fundamental Ratings
ONVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBQUX12.600.02
+0.16%
DSS AmericaFirst Large Cap Shr Buyback U
MMYLX9.21N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Company Val Adm
MOORX17.85N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R4
PRGTX19.96-0.02
-0.10%
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
MCRTX39.85-0.34
-0.85%
Morgan Stanley Insight R6

ONVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONVC and MNLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONVC and MNLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONVC
1D Price
Change %
ONVC100%
N/A
MNLXF - ONVC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - ONVC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRP - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
TCOM - ONVC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EM - ONVC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More