EMA
Price
$45.41
Change
+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.95B
FTS
Price
$47.44
Change
+$0.36 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.48B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMA vs FTS

Header iconEMA vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts EMA vs FTSBanner chart's image
Emera
Price$45.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization10.95B
Fortis
Price$47.44
Change+$0.36 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization19.48B
EMA vs FTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMA vs. FTS commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Buy and FTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EMA: $45.39 vs. FTS: $47.08)
Brand notoriety: EMA and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMA: 92% vs. FTS: 110%
Market capitalization -- EMA: $10.95B vs. FTS: $19.48B
EMA [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $10.95B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMA is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMA is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.90% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($19.5B) has a higher market cap than EMA($11B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than EMA: FTS (17.13) vs EMA (12.44). EMA YTD gains are higher at: 21.429 vs. FTS (13.255). FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.15B vs. EMA (3.22B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 625M vs. EMA (280M). EMA has less debt than FTS: EMA (19.3B) vs FTS (30B). FTS has higher revenues than EMA: FTS (11.5B) vs EMA (8.01B).
EMAFTSEMA / FTS
Capitalization11B19.5B56%
EBITDA3.22B5.15B63%
Gain YTD21.42913.255162%
P/E Ratio12.4417.1373%
Revenue8.01B11.5B70%
Total Cash280M625M45%
Total Debt19.3B30B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMA vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
EMA
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8065
SMR RATING
1..100
7877
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMA's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (58). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (80). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (78). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

EMA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (51). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (50). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMAFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLIFX21.270.15
+0.71%
Clifford Capital Partners Institutional
BRWAX26.330.17
+0.65%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq A
MAILX21.00N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Instl
VSMPX277.54N/A
N/A
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Pls
COVUX12.91N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value R

EMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMA
1D Price
Change %
EMA100%
-0.94%
FTS - EMA
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
ACLLF - EMA
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BIP - EMA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
EVRG - EMA
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
NWE - EMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-1.55%
DUK - FTS
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
ACLLF - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
BKH - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
ED - FTS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
PPL - FTS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More