Advertisement
EMA vs FTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Emera Inc. (EMA) vs. Fortis Inc. (FTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EMA and FTS are large Canadian utilities with regulated electric and natural gas operations across North America, offering defensive characteristics in volatile markets.
- Recent market activity shows FTS reporting Q2 2026 earnings that exceeded prior-year results alongside reaffirmed annual capital expenditure guidance of C$5.6 billion and a commitment to 4%-6% annual dividend growth through 2030.
- EMA delivered adjusted earnings per share growth of 7% in Q1 2026 and remains on track for full-year adjusted EPS expansion above its 5%-7% guidance range, with Q2 results scheduled for release on August 7, 2026.
- Dividend yields stand near 3.9% for EMA and approximately 3.2% for FTS, with both companies maintaining investment-grade balance sheets and stable cash flows from rate-regulated assets.
- Sector exposure to energy transition initiatives and infrastructure spending supports long-term visibility for both stocks, though FTS operates across a broader geographic footprint of 10 regions compared with EMA’s primary focus on Atlantic Canada and Florida.
- Relative performance in recent weeks reflects broader utility sector resilience amid moderating interest-rate expectations, with limited differentiation in short-term price behavior between the two names.
Introduction
Emera Inc. (EMA) and Fortis Inc. (FTS) represent two prominent Canadian utilities that appeal to income-oriented investors and those seeking exposure to regulated infrastructure assets. The comparison is particularly relevant for traders monitoring defensive sectors and institutional investors evaluating relative value within the utilities space amid evolving energy demand and regulatory environments. Both stocks trade on major North American exchanges and exhibit characteristics typical of rate-regulated businesses, including predictable cash flows and dividend distributions.
EMA Overview and Recent Performance
Emera Inc. operates regulated electric and natural gas utilities primarily in Atlantic Canada and Florida, with additional energy services activities. In recent market activity, the company reported Q1 2026 adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of C$1.37, reflecting a 7% year-over-year increase driven by contributions from Tampa Electric and Peoples Gas Systems. Reported net income for the quarter stood at C$562 million. The firm remains positioned to achieve full-year adjusted EPS growth above its 5%-7% annualized guidance range. Upcoming Q2 2026 results, scheduled for release on August 7, 2026, represent the next catalyst for investor sentiment. Stock behavior in recent weeks has aligned with broader utility sector movements influenced by interest-rate dynamics and infrastructure spending expectations.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. provides electric and gas utility services across a diversified platform spanning 10 operating regions in Canada and the United States. In recent market activity, the company delivered Q2 2026 EPS of C$0.78, up from C$0.76 in the prior-year period, and confirmed that its C$5.6 billion annual capital plan remains on track. Management reiterated expectations for 4%-6% annual dividend growth through 2030. The stock has exhibited steady performance consistent with sector peers, supported by regulatory approvals such as the Tilbury liquefied natural gas expansion in British Columbia. Recent sentiment reflects confidence in earnings visibility and balance-sheet strength within the regulated utilities framework.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s most relevant AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, robust risk metrics, and favorable performance statistics earn placement in the Trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, allowing users to explore options suited to various market environments. Performance data and backtested results are accessible directly on the platform, providing transparent insights into each bot’s historical outcomes and ticker coverage. Review the Trending AI Robots page to explore the latest selections.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EMA and FTS share core business models centered on regulated utilities yet differ in scale and geographic diversification, with FTS maintaining a larger market capitalization and broader North American footprint. Growth drivers for both include ongoing capital investment in grid modernization and clean-energy infrastructure, though FTS’s recent earnings release and extended dividend guidance provide more immediate visibility. Recent momentum has favored stability over outperformance, with limited divergence in price behavior during the past several weeks. Risk factors such as regulatory outcomes, interest-rate sensitivity, and currency fluctuations apply similarly, while EMA carries slightly higher dividend yield exposure. Market sentiment remains constructive for the sector overall, with both names viewed as defensive holdings rather than high-growth vehicles.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including recent earnings delivery, capital-plan execution, and dividend-growth visibility, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to FTS due to its completed Q2 reporting cycle and reaffirmed multi-year targets. EMA remains competitively positioned ahead of its own Q2 release, with trend consistency supported by prior-quarter results. The assessment reflects relative positioning within a stable sector environment rather than a definitive ranking.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.18% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (+0.24% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| EMA | FTS | EMA / FTS | |
| Capitalization | 15.8B | 28.8B | 55% |
| EBITDA | 3.51B | 5.96B | 59% |
| Gain YTD | 3.513 | 8.240 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.69 | 23.06 | 98% |
| Revenue | 8.91B | 12.4B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 2.46B | 384M | 640% |
| Total Debt | 24B | 36.3B | 66% |
EMA | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMA's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (49). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (83). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (79). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (59). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (48). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
| EMA | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 28% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 39% | 11 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 37% |
Advertisement
EMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been closely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with EMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then EMA could also see price increases.