Advertisement
EMA vs FTS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Emera Incorporated (EMA) vs. Fortis Inc. (FTS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EMA and FTS are regulated electric utilities with low betas (0.46 and 0.43), offering defensive positioning in volatile markets.
- FTS boasts a larger market cap ($29B vs. $16B) and stronger YTD gains (10% vs. 8%), reflecting broader scale across North America and the Caribbean.
- EMA provides a higher dividend yield (4.0% vs. 3.3%) with a payout ratio of 86%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Recent analyst coverage shows mixed but stable sentiment, with Barclays initiating Equal Weight on EMA and Overweight on FTS in late April.
- In recent market activity, both stocks have shown resilience near 52-week highs, supported by quarterly dividend declarations and capital plans.
- Upcoming earnings—FTS on May 6 and EMA on May 8—could influence short-term momentum.
Introduction
Emera Incorporated (EMA) and Fortis Inc. (FTS) stand out as prominent players in the North American utilities sector, both emphasizing regulated electricity generation, transmission, and distribution. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid shifting energy demands and interest rate environments. Investors seeking stable dividends and low-volatility exposure—such as those building defensive portfolios or income strategies—will find value in evaluating relative strengths like yield, growth prospects, and sector catalysts. With both exhibiting resilience in recent weeks, understanding their contrasts aids informed allocation in a utilities-focused rotation.
EMA Overview and Recent Performance
Emera Incorporated (EMA), headquartered in Halifax, Canada, is a geographically diverse energy company investing in electricity generation, transmission, and distribution across the U.S., Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. Key segments include Florida Electric Utility, Canadian Electric Utilities, and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure. With a market cap of approximately $16 billion, EMA trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 21.1 and forward P/E of 20.0, reflecting steady earnings visibility.
In recent market activity, EMA has hovered near its 52-week high of $54.06, posting YTD gains of 7.6% and 1-year returns of 22%. A beta of 0.46 underscores its defensive nature. Sentiment has been bolstered by a quarterly dividend declaration of C$0.733 (yield ~4.0%), note redemptions, and executive transitions, including COO Judy Steele's retirement. Analyst actions, such as Barclays' Equal Weight initiation at $53, signal balanced views amid a C$20 billion capital plan. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 8 could highlight progress in renewable integrations and rate base growth, influencing near-term price stability.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. (FTS), based in St. John's, Canada, operates as one of North America's largest utilities, serving 3.5 million electricity and gas customers across Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean. It spans regulated utilities, with subsidiaries like ITC handling high-voltage transmission. Boasting a $29 billion market cap, FTS carries a trailing P/E of 23.0 and forward P/E of 21.6, supported by consistent rate base expansion.
Recent weeks have seen FTS maintain proximity to its 52-week high of $58.78, with YTD performance at 10.1% and 1-year returns of 20.3%. Its beta of 0.43 highlights low volatility. Positive drivers include analyst upgrades like CIBC's price target hike to C$81, BlackRock's stake increase, and preparations for Q1 earnings on May 6 and the annual meeting. A dividend yield of 3.3% (ex-date May 15) reinforces its appeal, with recent coverage from Barclays (Overweight) underscoring optimism around multi-year growth and regulatory stability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of Tickeron’s total library of 351 bots, each trained on thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from momentum and breakout patterns to volatility plays and sector themes like semiconductors, industrials, data centers, and energy—using short machine learning timeframes (e.g., 5-15 minutes) for real-time signals. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +162% (e.g., USAR/SMR/CIFR bot), win rates reaching 88%, profit factors as high as 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17. Virtual and brokerage agents incorporate risk management like TP/SL corridors (e.g., 3%/2%). Traders can explore copy trading options tailored to current conditions. Visit Trending AI Robots to evaluate these high performers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both EMA and FTS thrive in the regulated utilities sector, prioritizing stable cash flows from essential services, but differ in scale and diversification. FTS's vast footprint (91,000 km of lines) contrasts EMA's focused operations in Florida and Atlantic Canada, exposing FTS to broader growth drivers like U.S. transmission expansions while EMA leverages regional renewables.
Recent momentum favors FTS with superior YTD returns, though EMA edges on yield and valuation (lower P/E, PEG of 1.19 vs. 2.89). Risk profiles align closely with sub-0.5 betas and payout ratios (86% vs. 73%), but FTS's larger enterprise value ($55B vs. $33B) implies greater debt leverage. Market sentiment tilts toward FTS via recent overweight ratings, while EMA benefits from capital plans. Trade-offs center on income (EMA) versus size-driven stability (FTS).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward FTS based on superior YTD momentum, larger scale, stronger recent analyst sentiment, and trend consistency near highs. Its lower payout ratio supports sustained dividend growth, while diversified operations enhance catalyst potential ahead of earnings. That said, EMA remains probabilistically attractive for yield seekers given its valuation edge. Observable factors like relative stability favor FTS in the present environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMA is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EMA (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.83% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| EMA | FTS | EMA / FTS | |
| Capitalization | 15.9B | 28B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 3.51B | 5.91B | 59% |
| Gain YTD | 4.833 | 5.333 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.64 | 22.12 | 98% |
| Revenue | 8.91B | 12.2B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 2.46B | 359M | 684% |
| Total Debt | 24B | 35.4B | 68% |
EMA | FTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMA's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (61). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (79). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (78). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
EMA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (56). This means that EMA’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as EMA (42). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to EMA’s over the last 12 months.
| EMA | FTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 34% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 14 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
EMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMA has been loosely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMA jumps, then ED could also see price increases.