EME
Price
$823.05
Change
+$11.52 (+1.42%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
36.58B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$707.74
Change
+$24.45 (+3.58%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
106.2B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EME vs PWR

Header iconEME vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts EME vs PWRBanner chart's image
EME vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both EME and PWR have delivered exceptional year-to-date gains, with PWR at approximately 83% outperforming EME's 53% amid infrastructure demand.
  • Recent quarterly results show robust growth: EME reported 19.7% revenue increase to $4.63 billion and raised 2026 guidance, while PWR posted 26.3% revenue growth to $7.87 billion with a record $48.5 billion backlog.
  • PWR benefits from broader exposure to electric power transmission and renewables, driving stronger recent momentum, while EME excels in mechanical/electrical services for data centers and facilities.
  • Tickeron's AI robots feature PWR in high-performing industrials strategies with up to 71% annualized returns, highlighting its appeal in current market rotations.
  • Both stocks trade at premiums but PWR shows superior YTD relative strength, though EME offers higher margins and lower debt.

Introduction

EMCOR Group (EME) and Quanta Services (PWR) operate in the booming infrastructure sector, focusing on electrical, mechanical, and energy-related construction amid rising demand for data centers, grid modernization, and electrification. This stock comparison is relevant for investors eyeing industrials exposure, particularly those tracking relative performance in engineering and construction. With both delivering triple-digit one-year returns driven by strong backlogs and earnings beats, traders can assess momentum, growth drivers, and sector tailwinds to inform positioning in a market favoring infrastructure plays.

EME Overview and Recent Performance

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is a leading specialty contractor providing electrical and mechanical construction, facilities services, and industrial solutions primarily in the U.S. and U.K. The company has benefited from heightened demand in data centers, manufacturing, and healthcare projects. In recent market activity, EME shares have traded near 52-week highs around $933, reflecting year-to-date gains of over 52% and one-year returns exceeding 114%. First-quarter 2026 results showed record revenues of $4.63 billion, up 19.7% year-over-year, with diluted EPS at $6.84, a 30% increase. Remaining performance obligations hit $15.62 billion, up 32.9%, prompting raised full-year guidance to $18.50-$19.25 billion in revenue. Sentiment has been buoyed by strong execution in U.S. electrical and mechanical segments, though shares reflect premium valuations amid broader industrials momentum.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) delivers comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, and pipelines, serving utilities, data centers, and energy firms. Recent weeks have seen PWR shares surge to new highs near $772, with year-to-date performance around 83% and one-year gains over 140%, outpacing peers. Q1 2026 revenues reached $7.87 billion, up 26.3%, with adjusted diluted EPS of $2.68 and a record backlog of $48.5 billion. Full-year guidance was lifted to $34.7-$35.2 billion in revenue, fueled by utility and data center demand. Positive sentiment stems from execution in electric power infrastructure and expanding renewables exposure, supporting sustained upward price behavior despite elevated multiples.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing bots from its library of over 350 AI trading agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—those excelling in momentum, sector rotation, and risk-managed strategies like TP/SL corridors (take-profit/stop-loss)—earn a spot among the 25+ featured. Stats highlight impressive results: annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors to 11.7, with timeframes from 5min to 60min and sectors like industrials (including PWR in a +71% bot), semis, and AI infrastructure. These diverse bots offer styles from trend-following to multi-agent plays. Explore Trending AI Robots to see real-time signals and consider subscribing for copy-trading insights tailored to today’s market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both EME and PWR thrive in electrical infrastructure, but diverge in focus: EME emphasizes mechanical/electrical building systems and facilities services (higher ~12% segment margins), while PWR leads in large-scale power transmission, renewables, and pipelines (broader backlog scale). Growth drivers include shared data center and grid tailwinds, yet PWR edges recent momentum with 34% 1-month gains vs. EME's 23%. Risk factors: EME has lower debt and higher ROE; PWR faces acquisition-related leverage but boasts superior YTD relative strength. Market sentiment favors PWR's utility exposure amid electrification, trading at a higher P/E premium, while EME offers value in stable non-residential construction.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PWR, based on stronger trend consistency, explosive recent momentum (83% YTD vs. 53%), record backlog scale, and inclusion in top-performing industrials robots yielding 70%+ annualized returns. PWR's catalysts in renewables and transmission position it favorably amid grid upgrades, though EME trails closely with margin stability. Probabilistic edge to PWR for near-term outperformance in infrastructure rotations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
EME vs. PWR commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EME is a StrongBuy and PWR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EME: $823.05 vs. PWR: $707.74)
Brand notoriety: EME and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EME: 69% vs. PWR: 91%
Market capitalization -- EME: $36.58B vs. PWR: $106.2B
EME [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $36.58B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $106.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $10.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EME is a better buy in the long-term than PWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than EME.

Price Growth

EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.83% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($106B) has a higher market cap than EME($36.6B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than EME: PWR (97.08) vs EME (27.65). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 67.764 vs. EME (34.679). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. EME (2.02B). EME has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. PWR (365M). EME has less debt than PWR: EME (510M) vs PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than EME: PWR (30.1B) vs EME (17.7B).
EMEPWREME / PWR
Capitalization36.6B106B35%
EBITDA2.02B2.71B75%
Gain YTD34.67967.76451%
P/E Ratio27.6597.0828%
Revenue17.7B30.1B59%
Total Cash916M365M251%
Total Debt510M6.32B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EME vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
EME
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
2463
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EME's Valuation (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (88). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (7). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

EME's SMR Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (63). This means that EME’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (44). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (27). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMEPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRNT2.990.07
+2.40%
Ceragon Networks Ltd
BBVA23.340.19
+0.82%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
TDOC7.340.03
+0.41%
Teladoc Health
VSXY78.880.10
+0.13%
Victoria'S Secret & Co.
MDXH0.54-0.04
-7.62%
MDxHealth SA

EME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EME
1D Price
Change %
EME100%
+1.42%
FIX - EME
79%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
MYRG - EME
68%
Closely correlated
+4.86%
IESC - EME
68%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
PWR - EME
67%
Closely correlated
+3.58%
MTZ - EME
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More