Advertisement
EME vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EME (EMCOR Group) and PWR (Quanta Services) are engineering-and-construction leaders leveraged to the artificial intelligence data center and power infrastructure buildout, but they occupy different parts of the value chain.
- PWR is the larger and faster-growing business, with a record backlog of roughly $53 billion and multiple 2026 guidance raises, while EME pairs a record performance-obligation base with a materially lower valuation.
- Both stocks have pulled back from their 52-week highs in recent weeks, though EME has experienced a sharper short-term retreat as investors weigh premium contractor valuations.
- Relative performance and market positioning differ: PWR commands a far higher trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, reflecting faster top-line growth, while EME trades at a lower multiple and offers a smaller dividend yield.
- For additional context on each company's developments and daily activity, explore EME Major News and EME Today's Price Move, as well as PWR Major News and PWR Today's Price Move.
- To see how automated strategies are positioning across these and other tickers, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
The electrification of the economy — driven by grid modernization, power generation expansion, and surging data center demand tied to artificial intelligence — has put engineering-and-construction companies at the center of one of the market's most visible capital spending cycles. EME (EMCOR Group) and PWR (Quanta Services) are two of the most prominent names exposed to this theme, yet their business models and risk profiles differ meaningfully. This stock comparison is most relevant for investors and traders seeking to weigh a diversified mechanical-and-electrical contractor against the nation's largest electric infrastructure specialist, particularly as both companies approach their next earnings reports.
EME Overview and Recent Performance
EME (EMCOR Group) provides electrical and mechanical construction, facilities, building, and industrial services across the United States and the United Kingdom. The company has leaned into high-value, complex projects, including mission-critical and data center facilities, supported by a record base of remaining performance obligations (RPOs) — a measure of contracted work yet to be completed — reported at roughly $17 billion alongside organic growth near 20%.
In recent market activity, EME has experienced a notable pullback from its 52-week high, with the share price retreating by a double-digit percentage over a span of several weeks. This softness has come despite the company's strong multi-year record: over three and five years, total shareholder returns have compounded sharply. Sentiment has been shaped by concerns about elevated labor costs, premium valuations across contractor peers, and questions about the durability of the data center cycle. The company's trailing P/E ratio remains elevated relative to the broader market but well below that of its faster-growing peer.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
PWR (Quanta Services) is the largest electrical infrastructure construction company in the United States, offering solutions across electric and gas utilities, power generation, transmission and distribution, renewable integration, and underground infrastructure. Its "self-perform" model keeps the large majority of work in-house, which management frames as a source of execution and labor certainty.
PWR has posted accelerating revenue growth in recent quarters, with quarterly revenue rising more than 40% year over year and a record backlog climbing to approximately $53 billion. Management has raised full-year guidance on multiple occasions, reflecting stronger-than-expected demand and a series of completed acquisitions. Despite this momentum, the stock has also pulled back from its all-time high in recent weeks and trades well below its peak, even as its year-to-date return remains strongly positive. Its trailing P/E ratio is considerably higher than EME's, signaling that investors are already pricing in substantial future growth.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Because not every bot suits every market backdrop, only the strongest and most relevant performers are surfaced in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots differ in trading style, holding period, performance statistics, and the specific sets of tickers they monitor, allowing users to compare approaches rather than rely on a single signal. The page highlights bots that have demonstrated suitability for current conditions, giving traders a focused starting point for evaluating automated strategies. Explore Trending AI Robots to see which automated approaches are currently standing out.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two companies differ most clearly in scale and focus. EME, with a market capitalization around $28 billion, is a diversified mechanical-and-electrical contractor with meaningful exposure to commercial and industrial facilities services. PWR, at roughly $82 billion, is more directly concentrated in electric grid, transmission, distribution, and power generation infrastructure, giving it broader utility relationships and a larger addressable backlog.
On growth, PWR has shown faster revenue acceleration and repeated guidance increases, while EME has posted solid but comparatively steadier organic growth. On valuation, the trade-off is pronounced: PWR trades at a much higher trailing P/E multiple, reflecting stronger near-term momentum, whereas EME carries a lower multiple and has experienced a sharper recent drawdown. Shared risk factors include labor availability and cost, permitting delays, and sensitivity to any slowdown in data center and grid capital spending. Sentiment toward both names has cooled in recent weeks after extended rallies, though PWR retains a larger cushion of reported demand visibility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors — trend consistency, backlog visibility, revenue momentum, and the cadence of guidance revisions — Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward PWR in the current environment. The company's larger and faster-growing backlog, accelerating revenue, and repeated outlook increases suggest a more durable near-term fundamental catalyst path. That said, PWR's substantially higher valuation introduces greater sensitivity to any disappointment, whereas EME offers a comparatively lower-multiple alternative with strong long-term compounding. The assessment is probabilistic and could shift with upcoming earnings results and changes in relative momentum.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EME is a Buy and PWR is a Buy.
EME's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for EME moved out of oversold territory on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 13 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 10 of the 13 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 56 cases where EME's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +3.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EME advanced for three days, in 263 of 359 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
EME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 236 of 347 cases where EME Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 68%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on EME as a result. In 44 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for EME turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 27 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 59%.
EME moved below its 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EME crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EME declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 21 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 51 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.349) is normal, around the industry mean (15.247). P/E Ratio (21.078) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.505). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.315) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.002) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.780) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EME’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PWR's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for PWR moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +9.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWR advanced for three days, in 258 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
PWR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 254 of 362 cases where PWR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWR as a result. In 48 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PWR turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 66%.
PWR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PWR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PWR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.683) is normal, around the industry mean (15.247). P/E Ratio (69.981) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.505). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.443) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
EME | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (51) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (85). This means that EME’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (21). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's SMR Rating (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (62). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EME (73). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than EME’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 51% | 10 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EME’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +13.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +8.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
EME is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+8.42% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
EME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EME | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| FIX - EME | 80% Closely correlated | -7.06% | ||
| PWR - EME | 77% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| ECG - EME | 69% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| STRL - EME | 68% Closely correlated | -7.43% | ||
| MYRG - EME | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||