Advertisement
EME vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both EME and PWR are S&P 500 infrastructure contractors riding strong demand from data centers, grid modernization, and manufacturing reshoring.
- PWR delivered faster revenue growth and nearly doubled its net income in its latest quarter, with year-to-date share gains exceeding 40%.
- EME posted record revenues and a record $17.14 billion in remaining performance obligations (RPOs), with more moderate year-to-date gains.
- PWR trades at a notably higher valuation multiple, reflecting stronger growth expectations but leaving less room for error.
- Relative performance favors PWR on momentum, while EME offers a comparatively lower valuation with strong execution and rising guidance.
Introduction
Investors tracking the infrastructure buildout behind artificial intelligence, electrification, and reshoring frequently weigh two large-cap contractors: EME (EMCOR Group) and PWR (Quanta Services). Both operate at the center of mission-critical electrical and mechanical construction, yet their business mixes, growth profiles, and valuations differ meaningfully. This stock comparison is relevant for traders monitoring relative performance and momentum, as well as long-term investors assessing market positioning across two high-quality names in the same broad industry. By examining recent performance, sentiment shifts, and structural drivers, readers can better understand where each company stands in the current market environment.
EME Overview and Recent Performance
EMCOR Group, Inc. is a Fortune 500 provider of mechanical and electrical construction services, industrial and energy infrastructure, and building services. The company's most recent quarter reflected broad-based strength, with revenues rising nearly 20% year over year to a record level, while earnings per share (EPS) climbed more than 30%. Operating margin expanded as disciplined execution and favorable project mix supported profitability.
A key driver of sentiment has been a record $17.14 billion in remaining performance obligations (RPOs), contracted work not yet recognized as revenue, which strengthened revenue visibility across data centers, water and wastewater, institutional, and healthcare markets. Management raised its full-year revenue and EPS guidance, and analysts subsequently revised estimates higher. Despite these fundamentals, shares have pulled back in recent months after a strong multi-year run, suggesting valuation pressure and normal volatility rather than a deterioration in the underlying outlook. The stock still carries a premium valuation relative to its own history.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. is the largest specialty contractor in North America focused on energy and communications infrastructure, spanning electric grid, power generation, and underground utility work. Its most recent quarter showed accelerating momentum, with revenues rising more than 40% year over year and net income nearly doubling. The electric segment was the primary driver, benefiting from grid modernization, storm hardening, and data center interconnection demand.
Quanta also raised its full-year outlook and has continued to attract analyst support, including a recent upgrade to an outperform rating with a higher price target. Year to date, shares have advanced more than 40%, outpacing the broader market. That rally has been accompanied by some short-term choppiness and profit-taking, and the stock now trades at a rich valuation multiple, reflecting the market's expectation that AI-driven power demand and utility capital expenditures will sustain elevated growth. A large backlog tied to power infrastructure underscores the durability of the demand story.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven complement to fundamental research, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's most relevant automated strategies for current market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of covered securities. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the strongest and most adaptable strategies earn a place in this curated section. The page offers a convenient way to review and compare top-performing bots side by side. Explore Trending AI Robots to see which automated strategies are currently aligned with prevailing conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Although both companies serve overlapping infrastructure demand, their business models differ in emphasis. EME skews toward mechanical and electrical construction plus building and industrial services, with meaningful exposure to HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) retrofits and institutional work. PWR leans more heavily on large-scale electric grid and energy transmission projects, giving it outsized exposure to utility spending and AI-driven power demand.
On growth and momentum, PWR has posted faster revenue expansion and stronger share-price gains, while EME has demonstrated steadier, high-quality execution with expanding margins. The trade-off appears in valuation: PWR trades at a significantly higher forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, while EME commands a premium versus its own historical average but a lower multiple than its peer. Risk factors also differ, with EME more exposed to labor costs and project timing, and PWR more sensitive to utility award cycles and the durability of data center capital spending.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, growth catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt toward PWR in the current environment. The stock's stronger upward momentum, accelerating earnings growth, and alignment with durable power-demand and grid-modernization themes provide a more consistent trend profile. However, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive forecast. EME offers compelling fundamentals, record backlog, and a comparatively more moderate valuation, which could appeal to investors prioritizing stability over momentum. The AI-favored position may shift as market conditions evolve, which is precisely why automated, adaptive tools are useful for monitoring relative performance over time.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EME is a Buy and PWR is a Buy.
EME | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (86). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (14). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's SMR Rating (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (46). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (51). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EME’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
EME is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.91% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
EME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EME | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| FIX - EME | 81% Closely correlated | -4.53% | ||
| PWR - EME | 77% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ECG - EME | 69% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| STRL - EME | 68% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| MYRG - EME | 68% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||