EMCOR Group (EME) and Quanta Services (PWR) operate in the booming infrastructure sector, focusing on electrical, mechanical, and energy-related construction amid rising demand for data centers, grid modernization, and electrification. This stock comparison is relevant for investors eyeing industrials exposure, particularly those tracking relative performance in engineering and construction. With both delivering triple-digit one-year returns driven by strong backlogs and earnings beats, traders can assess momentum, growth drivers, and sector tailwinds to inform positioning in a market favoring infrastructure plays.
EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is a leading specialty contractor providing electrical and mechanical construction, facilities services, and industrial solutions primarily in the U.S. and U.K. The company has benefited from heightened demand in data centers, manufacturing, and healthcare projects. In recent market activity, EME shares have traded near 52-week highs around $933, reflecting year-to-date gains of over 52% and one-year returns exceeding 114%. First-quarter 2026 results showed record revenues of $4.63 billion, up 19.7% year-over-year, with diluted EPS at $6.84, a 30% increase. Remaining performance obligations hit $15.62 billion, up 32.9%, prompting raised full-year guidance to $18.50-$19.25 billion in revenue. Sentiment has been buoyed by strong execution in U.S. electrical and mechanical segments, though shares reflect premium valuations amid broader industrials momentum.
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) delivers comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewables, communications, and pipelines, serving utilities, data centers, and energy firms. Recent weeks have seen PWR shares surge to new highs near $772, with year-to-date performance around 83% and one-year gains over 140%, outpacing peers. Q1 2026 revenues reached $7.87 billion, up 26.3%, with adjusted diluted EPS of $2.68 and a record backlog of $48.5 billion. Full-year guidance was lifted to $34.7-$35.2 billion in revenue, fueled by utility and data center demand. Positive sentiment stems from execution in electric power infrastructure and expanding renewables exposure, supporting sustained upward price behavior despite elevated multiples.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing bots from its library of over 350 AI trading agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—those excelling in momentum, sector rotation, and risk-managed strategies like TP/SL corridors (take-profit/stop-loss)—earn a spot among the 25+ featured. Stats highlight impressive results: annualized returns up to 169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors to 11.7, with timeframes from 5min to 60min and sectors like industrials (including PWR in a +71% bot), semis, and AI infrastructure. These diverse bots offer styles from trend-following to multi-agent plays. Explore Trending AI Robots to see real-time signals and consider subscribing for copy-trading insights tailored to today’s market.
Both EME and PWR thrive in electrical infrastructure, but diverge in focus: EME emphasizes mechanical/electrical building systems and facilities services (higher ~12% segment margins), while PWR leads in large-scale power transmission, renewables, and pipelines (broader backlog scale). Growth drivers include shared data center and grid tailwinds, yet PWR edges recent momentum with 34% 1-month gains vs. EME's 23%. Risk factors: EME has lower debt and higher ROE; PWR faces acquisition-related leverage but boasts superior YTD relative strength. Market sentiment favors PWR's utility exposure amid electrification, trading at a higher P/E premium, while EME offers value in stable non-residential construction.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PWR, based on stronger trend consistency, explosive recent momentum (83% YTD vs. 53%), record backlog scale, and inclusion in top-performing industrials robots yielding 70%+ annualized returns. PWR's catalysts in renewables and transmission position it favorably amid grid upgrades, though EME trails closely with margin stability. Probabilistic edge to PWR for near-term outperformance in infrastructure rotations.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.72%.
EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| EME | PWR | EME / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 36.6B | 106B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 2.02B | 2.71B | 75% |
| Gain YTD | 34.679 | 67.764 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.65 | 97.08 | 28% |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 30.1B | 59% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 365M | 251% |
| Total Debt | 510M | 6.32B | 8% |
EME | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (88). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (7). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's SMR Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (63). This means that EME’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (44). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (27). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EME | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| FIX - EME | 79% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| MYRG - EME | 68% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| IESC - EME | 68% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| PWR - EME | 67% Closely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| MTZ - EME | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||