Advertisement
EME vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? EMCOR Group (EME) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- EMCOR Group (EME) and Quanta Services (PWR) both operate in the infrastructure and construction sectors, with exposure to electrical, mechanical, and energy-related projects.
- PWR has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 58% compared to EME’s roughly 28% as of early July 2026.
- EME reported record first-quarter 2026 revenues of $4.63 billion and raised full-year guidance, supported by demand in data center infrastructure.
- PWR announced a new $1 billion stock repurchase program and a quarterly dividend in recent months alongside solid earnings growth.
- Both companies benefit from broader infrastructure spending trends, though PWR shows higher recent momentum while EME trades at a comparatively lower valuation multiple.
- Market sentiment remains positive for the sector, with relative performance favoring PWR in the recent period.
Introduction
EMCOR Group (EME) and Quanta Services (PWR) represent two prominent players in the U.S. infrastructure and specialty construction space. Investors and traders often compare these stocks when evaluating exposure to electrical and mechanical construction, energy infrastructure, and data center development. The comparison is particularly relevant for those seeking to assess relative performance, valuation differences, and sector-specific catalysts in a market environment shaped by ongoing capital spending on power, renewables, and technology facilities. This analysis provides a factual overview of business models, recent results, and positioning to support informed evaluation.
EMCOR Group (EME) Overview and Recent Performance
EMCOR Group (EME) provides electrical and mechanical construction, as well as facilities services, primarily across commercial, industrial, and government markets. In recent market activity, the stock has advanced alongside sector strength, posting year-to-date gains near 28%. First-quarter 2026 results showed record revenues of $4.63 billion, up nearly 20% year-over-year, driven by electrical and mechanical segments. Remaining performance obligations reached a record $15.62 billion, reflecting strong backlog visibility. The company raised its 2026 revenue and earnings guidance. Recent weeks have seen continued focus on demand for data center infrastructure, supporting sentiment despite broader market fluctuations.
Quanta Services (PWR) Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services (PWR) delivers infrastructure solutions focused on electric power, renewable energy, and communications. The stock has shown robust recent performance, with year-to-date returns around 58% through early July 2026. First-quarter results demonstrated significant revenue growth to $7.87 billion and improved earnings. In recent market activity, the company declared a quarterly cash dividend and authorized a new $1 billion stock repurchase program. Strong demand for grid modernization and renewable projects has contributed to momentum, with the shares trading near multi-month levels amid sector tailwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles, allowing users to review detailed statistics before considering any automated approach. All bots maintain distinct trading styles and ticker sets. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current options and performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
EMCOR Group (EME) and Quanta Services (PWR) share exposure to U.S. infrastructure spending but differ in emphasis. EME focuses on mechanical and electrical construction with notable data center backlog, while PWR centers on electric power transmission, renewables, and communications infrastructure. Recent momentum has favored PWR, with stronger year-to-date gains and higher relative returns over the past year. EME offers a more modest valuation multiple alongside solid earnings growth and backlog expansion. Risk factors include execution on large projects and sensitivity to construction cycles for both, though PWR’s larger scale in energy segments introduces distinct commodity and regulatory exposures. Market sentiment in recent weeks has reflected broader enthusiasm for infrastructure themes, with PWR exhibiting more pronounced price appreciation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to Quanta Services (PWR). Stronger recent performance metrics, including superior year-to-date returns and active capital return initiatives, contribute to this assessment alongside sector tailwinds in power infrastructure. EMCOR Group (EME) maintains competitive fundamentals through backlog growth but trails in near-term momentum indicators. This evaluation remains probabilistic and tied to observable data rather than forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EME is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
EME (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
EME is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-2.31% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| EME | PWR | EME / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 34.4B | 99.2B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 2.02B | 2.71B | 75% |
| Gain YTD | 26.774 | 56.694 | 47% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.02 | 90.66 | 29% |
| Revenue | 17.7B | 30.1B | 59% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 250M | 366% |
| Total Debt | 510M | 6.32B | 8% |
EME | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EME's Valuation (60) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (88). This means that EME’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (8). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
EME's SMR Rating (24) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (63). This means that EME’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (51). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as EME (44). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to EME’s over the last 12 months.
| EME | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 52% |
Advertisement
EME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EME has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EME jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.