EML
Price
$28.19
Change
-$0.89 (-3.06%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
204.68M
HLMN
Price
$10.02
Change
-$0.10 (-0.99%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EML vs HLMN

Header iconEML vs HLMN Comparison
Open Charts EML vs HLMNBanner chart's image
Eastern
Price$28.19
Change-$0.89 (-3.06%)
Volume$7.92K
Capitalization204.68M
Hillman Solutions
Price$10.02
Change-$0.10 (-0.99%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization2.08B
EML vs HLMN Comparison Chart
Loading...
EML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EML vs. HLMN commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EML is a Hold and HLMN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EML: $28.19 vs. HLMN: $10.02)
Brand notoriety: EML and HLMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EML: 83% vs. HLMN: 146%
Market capitalization -- EML: $204.68M vs. HLMN: $2.08B
EML [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $204.68M. HLMN’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EML’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EML is a better buy in the long-term than HLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EML’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLMN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EML is a better buy in the short-term than HLMN.

Price Growth

EML (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while HLMN (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

EML is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.

HLMN is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.49% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLMN($2.08B) has a higher market cap than EML($205M). HLMN has higher P/E ratio than EML: HLMN (104.17) vs EML (24.07). EML YTD gains are higher at: 6.627 vs. HLMN (2.875). HLMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 183M vs. EML (22M). HLMN has more cash in the bank: 38.6M vs. EML (9.29M). EML has less debt than HLMN: EML (62.1M) vs HLMN (836M). HLMN has higher revenues than EML: HLMN (1.48B) vs EML (273M).
EMLHLMNEML / HLMN
Capitalization205M2.08B10%
EBITDA22M183M12%
Gain YTD6.6272.875231%
P/E Ratio24.07104.1723%
Revenue273M1.48B18%
Total Cash9.29M38.6M24%
Total Debt62.1M836M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EML: Fundamental Ratings
EML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMLHLMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RICIX10.17-0.01
-0.10%
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq I
NSFDX9.04-0.04
-0.44%
Natixis Target Retirement 2020 N
NOIGX10.57-0.07
-0.66%
Northern International Equity
HFMRX29.83-0.83
-2.71%
Hartford MidCap R3
APHSX36.59-1.03
-2.74%
Artisan Small Cap Institutional

EML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EML has been loosely correlated with IRRHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EML jumps, then IRRHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EML
1D Price
Change %
EML100%
-3.06%
IRRHF - EML
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLMN - EML
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
PKOH - EML
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
DCI - EML
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
OFLX - EML
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
More

HLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLMN has been loosely correlated with RRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLMN jumps, then RRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMN
1D Price
Change %
HLMN100%
-0.99%
RRX - HLMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
NPO - HLMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
ITT - HLMN
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
ZWS - HLMN
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
WTS - HLMN
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
More