EMN
Price
$78.35
Change
+$2.31 (+3.04%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
11.8B
11 days until earnings call
IFF
Price
$73.17
Change
+$1.79 (+2.51%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
22.05B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMN vs IFF

Header iconEMN vs IFF Comparison
Open Charts EMN vs IFFBanner chart's image
Eastman Chemical
Price$78.35
Change+$2.31 (+3.04%)
Volume$2.06M
Capitalization11.8B
International Flavors & Fragrances
Price$73.17
Change+$1.79 (+2.51%)
Volume$2.13M
Capitalization22.05B
EMN vs IFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMN vs. IFF commentary
Apr 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMN is a Hold and IFF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 13, 2025
Stock price -- (EMN: $78.35 vs. IFF: $73.17)
Brand notoriety: EMN and IFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMN: 165% vs. IFF: 107%
Market capitalization -- EMN: $11.8B vs. IFF: $22.05B
EMN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.8B. IFF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $22.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMN is a better buy in the long-term than IFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFF is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +3.73% price change this week, while IFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

IFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.10% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFF($22.1B) has a higher market cap than EMN($11.8B). IFF has higher P/E ratio than EMN: IFF (1367.17) vs EMN (13.39). IFF (-13.023) and EMN (-13.409) have similar YTD gains . EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.81B vs. IFF (-996M). IFF has more cash in the bank: 703M vs. EMN (548M). EMN has less debt than IFF: EMN (4.85B) vs IFF (10.8B). IFF has higher revenues than EMN: IFF (11.5B) vs EMN (9.21B).
EMNIFFEMN / IFF
Capitalization11.8B22.1B53%
EBITDA1.81B-996M-182%
Gain YTD-13.409-13.023103%
P/E Ratio13.391367.171%
Revenue9.21B11.5B80%
Total Cash548M703M78%
Total Debt4.85B10.8B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMN vs IFF: Fundamental Ratings
EMN
IFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
5387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a17

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (30) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as IFF (59) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew similarly to IFF’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFF (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFF’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's SMR Rating (53) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFF (87) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFF’s over the last 12 months.

IFF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as EMN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

IFF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as EMN (69) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAN14.900.50
+3.44%
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
GLD297.935.58
+1.91%
SPDR® Gold Shares
BFZ10.370.17
+1.67%
BLACKROCK CA Municipal
JPLD51.450.09
+0.18%
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
NUSA23.11-0.06
-0.26%
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with LYB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then LYB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
+3.04%
LYB - EMN
77%
Closely correlated
+4.69%
DOW - EMN
75%
Closely correlated
+4.18%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
DD - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
KWR - EMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More

IFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFF has been loosely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFF jumps, then DD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFF
1D Price
Change %
IFF100%
+2.51%
DD - IFF
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
PPG - IFF
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
LYB - IFF
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.69%
ECL - IFF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
EMN - IFF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
More