Advertisement
ENPH vs FLUX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENPH is a Hold and FLUX is a Hold.
| ENPH | FLUX | ENPH / FLUX | |
| Capitalization | 4.8B | 12.4M | 38,734% |
| EBITDA | 248M | -5.65M | -4,389% |
| Gain YTD | 13.417 | -54.827 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.99 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.33B | 42.1M | 3,157% |
| Total Cash | 938M | 305K | 307,541% |
| Total Debt | 582M | 8.51M | 6,839% |
ENPH | FLUX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLUX's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ENPH (85) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FLUX’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
FLUX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ENPH (100) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FLUX’s stock grew similarly to ENPH’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's SMR Rating (61) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUX (100) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FLUX (65) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew similarly to FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
ENPH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUX (100) in the null industry. This means that ENPH’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUX’s over the last 12 months.
| ENPH | FLUX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FLUX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ENPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FLUX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENPH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ENPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLUX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
ENPH (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while FLUX (@Electrical Products) price change was -2.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
ENPH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
FLUX is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-0.80% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
@Electrical Products (-2.10% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
Advertisement
ENPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENPH has been closely correlated with SEDG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENPH jumps, then SEDG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENPH | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| SEDG - ENPH | 68% Closely correlated | -5.63% | ||
| FCEL - ENPH | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| RUN - ENPH | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BE - ENPH | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.68% | ||
| FSLR - ENPH | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
FLUX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLUX and SEDG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLUX and SEDG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLUX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| SEDG - FLUX | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.63% | ||
| BEEM - FLUX | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
| CSIQ - FLUX | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| ENPH - FLUX | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RUN - FLUX | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||