It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ENSG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ENSG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ENSG (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while UHS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.35%.
ENSG is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
UHS is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ENSG | UHS | ENSG / UHS | |
Capitalization | 7.05B | 12.3B | 57% |
EBITDA | 353M | 1.71B | 21% |
Gain YTD | -3.395 | -3.736 | 91% |
P/E Ratio | 33.94 | 17.13 | 198% |
Revenue | 3.73B | 14.3B | 26% |
Total Cash | 527M | 119M | 443% |
Total Debt | 1.87B | 5.37B | 35% |
ENSG | UHS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UHS's Valuation (32) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENSG (74) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that UHS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENSG’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UHS (55) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ENSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's SMR Rating (48) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (48) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ENSG’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (61) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ENSG’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as UHS (89) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that ENSG’s stock grew similarly to UHS’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG | UHS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago73% | 16 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 6 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago69% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GDMN | 37.62 | 1.41 | +3.90% |
WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Gld Ms Stgy ETF | |||
IGF | 52.79 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
DTEC | 43.79 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | |||
HAUZ | 20.13 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | |||
VALQ | 60.97 | -1.07 | -1.72% |
American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENSG has been loosely correlated with USPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENSG jumps, then USPH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENSG | 100% | -1.50% | ||
USPH - ENSG | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
HCA - ENSG | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
AVAH - ENSG | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.08% | ||
PNTG - ENSG | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
UHS - ENSG | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UHS has been closely correlated with HCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UHS jumps, then HCA could also see price increases.