EPAC
Price
$44.28
Change
+$0.83 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
59 days until earnings call
KMT
Price
$24.25
Change
-$0.17 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EPAC vs KMT

Header iconEPAC vs KMT Comparison
Open Charts EPAC vs KMTBanner chart's image
Enerpac Tool Group
Price$44.28
Change+$0.83 (+1.91%)
Volume$228.24K
Capitalization1.93B
Kennametal
Price$24.25
Change-$0.17 (-0.70%)
Volume$855.47K
Capitalization1.93B
EPAC vs KMT Comparison Chart
Loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPAC vs. KMT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a Hold and KMT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EPAC: $44.28 vs. KMT: $24.25)
Brand notoriety: EPAC and KMT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPAC: 63% vs. KMT: 103%
Market capitalization -- EPAC: $1.93B vs. KMT: $1.93B
EPAC [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.93B. KMT’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPAC is a better buy in the long-term than KMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMT is a better buy in the short-term than EPAC.

Price Growth

EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +8.16% price change this week, while KMT (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

KMT is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.92% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMT($1.93B) and EPAC($1.93B) have the same market capitalization . EPAC has higher P/E ratio than KMT: EPAC (26.10) vs KMT (16.15). EPAC YTD gains are higher at: 7.763 vs. KMT (0.958). KMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 313M vs. EPAC (128M). EPAC has more cash in the bank: 154M vs. KMT (90.7M). EPAC has less debt than KMT: EPAC (245M) vs KMT (666M). KMT has higher revenues than EPAC: KMT (2.07B) vs EPAC (597M).
EPACKMTEPAC / KMT
Capitalization1.93B1.93B100%
EBITDA128M313M41%
Gain YTD7.7630.958811%
P/E Ratio26.1016.15162%
Revenue597M2.07B29%
Total Cash154M90.7M170%
Total Debt245M666M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPAC vs KMT: Fundamental Ratings
EPAC
KMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
3977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMT's Valuation (17) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (77) in the null industry. This means that KMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMT (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (77) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KMT (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.

KMT's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (51) in the null industry. This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPACKMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAOFX17.080.26
+1.55%
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
FAYZX14.560.10
+0.69%
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
PMBPX44.400.27
+0.61%
Principal MidCap R5
GLNCX20.100.08
+0.40%
MFS Global New Discovery C
WASMX25.220.09
+0.36%
Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap

EPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAC
1D Price
Change %
EPAC100%
+1.91%
FSS - EPAC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
NPO - EPAC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
FELE - EPAC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
KMT - EPAC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
FLS - EPAC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More

KMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMT
1D Price
Change %
KMT100%
-0.70%
FELE - KMT
71%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
GGG - KMT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
NPO - KMT
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
RBC - KMT
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
LECO - KMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More