Advertisement
ATMU vs EPAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a Hold and EPAC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATMU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ATMU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- EPAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATMU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATMU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EPAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATMU is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.34% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Industrial Machinery (+1.40% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| ATMU | EPAC | ATMU / EPAC | |
| Capitalization | 4.1B | 1.82B | 225% |
| EBITDA | 344M | 139M | 247% |
| Gain YTD | 0.603 | -5.309 | -11% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.44 | 22.77 | 90% |
| Revenue | 1.83B | 625M | 292% |
| Total Cash | 210M | 98.7M | 213% |
| Total Debt | 1.06B | 187M | 566% |
EPAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ATMU | EPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 8 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 54% | 23 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ZAUG | 27.50 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrAug | |||
| RWK | 143.75 | -0.05 | -0.04% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | |||
| CSB | 63.78 | -0.08 | -0.13% |
| VictoryShares US SmCp Hi Div Vol Wtd ETF | |||
| FDIQ | 64.72 | -0.39 | -0.59% |
| Invesco Bloomberg Fincl Dt Prvdrs ETF | |||
| WISE | 39.54 | -0.60 | -1.49% |
| Themes Generative Artificial Int ETF | |||
ATMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMU | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| PH - ATMU | 73% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| DOV - ATMU | 69% Closely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| ITT - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CMI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| DCI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| LECO - EPAC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| RBC - EPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| ATMU - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| NPO - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| SNA - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||