Advertisement
ATMU vs EPAC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs. Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) has delivered a roughly 41% total return over the trailing twelve months, driven by strong aftermarket demand and successful operational separation from its former parent company.
- Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) has faced headwinds with approximately a 7–10% decline over the past year, weighed down by macroeconomic uncertainty and softness in its service segment, though a transformative acquisition of SFE Group has recently been announced.
- ATMU benefits from recurring aftermarket filtration revenue and pricing power, while EPAC is navigating a mixed industrial environment with pockets of organic product growth offset by service revenue contraction.
- Both companies maintain solid profitability, with ATMU reporting an adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) margin near 20% and EPAC posting approximately 25% adjusted EBITDA margin in recent quarters.
- EPAC's recently announced $472 million acquisition of SFE Group represents a notable catalyst, while ATMU's momentum has been supported by share repurchases and consistent earnings outperformance.
- From a trend-following and relative-strength perspective, the AI-driven analysis would likely favor ATMU in the current environment, though EPAC's valuation and acquisition catalyst introduce a different risk-reward calculus.
Introduction
Investors seeking exposure to the industrial sector often compare companies across different niches to identify where relative strength and forward-looking catalysts align. ATMU (Atmus Filtration Technologies) and EPAC (Enerpac Tool Group) represent two distinct industrial plays: one focused on filtration and media solutions for heavy-duty engines, the other on high-pressure hydraulic tools and precision lifting equipment. Both serve cyclical end markets, yet their recent stock performance and strategic trajectories have diverged meaningfully. This comparison is especially relevant for traders and investors evaluating mid-cap industrials where growth dynamics, margin profiles, and market sentiment can shift quickly. The following analysis examines how these two stocks compare across key dimensions.
ATMU Overview and Recent Performance
Atmus Filtration Technologies, headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, is a global leader in filtration and media solutions, primarily serving on-highway commercial vehicles and off-highway equipment markets including agriculture, construction, mining, and power generation. The company, which completed its full operational separation from Cummins in 2025, sells products predominantly under the Fleetguard brand. In recent quarters, ATMU has posted solid top-line growth—net sales reached $448 million in the third quarter of 2025, a 10.9% year-over-year increase—supported by higher volumes, pricing gains, and favorable currency effects. Adjusted EBITDA margins have improved to approximately 20.4%, reflecting manufacturing efficiencies and reduced one-time separation costs. The stock has appreciated approximately 41% over the trailing twelve months, with the 52-week range spanning from roughly $37 to $66.50. Sentiment has been buoyed by an active share repurchase program, a modest but growing dividend, and the company's ability to gain aftermarket share even as the North American heavy and medium-duty truck market faces projected declines of 20% to 25%. However, uncertainty around 2027 emissions requirements and potential tariff impacts remain areas of caution.
EPAC Overview and Recent Performance
Enerpac Tool Group, based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, designs, manufactures, and distributes high-pressure hydraulic tools, controlled force products, and heavy lifting technology solutions. The company operates primarily through its Industrial Tools & Services (IT&S) segment, serving end markets that include infrastructure, energy, manufacturing, and mining across more than 100 countries. In recent quarters, EPAC has demonstrated resilience in its product business—IT&S product sales grew 5% organically year-over-year in the most recent fiscal third quarter—while its service segment has faced pressure from project mix shifts and geopolitical headwinds, particularly the conflict in the Middle East. Net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 reached approximately $168 million, a 6% increase from the prior year, and adjusted EPS (Earnings Per Share) came in at $0.60, beating consensus estimates. The company's most significant recent development is the announced acquisition of SFE Group for roughly $472 million, a deal expected to expand Enerpac's addressable market by approximately $1 billion and be accretive to adjusted EPS in fiscal 2027. Despite operational strengths, the stock has underperformed over the past year, declining roughly 7–10%, with the 52-week range spanning from about $32.35 to $45.00.
Trending AI Robots
For traders and investors seeking an analytical edge in navigating stock comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots, each trading thousands of different tickers, with specialized strategies ranging from swing trading and momentum-based approaches to longer-term trend-following models. Only the highest-conviction, best-performing bots earn placement in this curated section. The bots featured on the Trending AI Robots page exhibit a wide spectrum of performance statistics, with some showcasing annualized returns that meaningfully outpace benchmark indices and others distinguished by high win rates or exceptional risk-adjusted metrics. Each bot operates with a distinct trading style, timeframe, and ticker universe, allowing users to find approaches that resonate with their own analytical preferences. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which automated strategies are currently identifying opportunities in stocks like ATMU and EPAC.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both ATMU and EPAC operate within the broader industrial sector, their business models, growth drivers, and market positioning differ in meaningful ways. ATMU generates a significant portion of its revenue from the aftermarket—replacement filters and related products—creating a recurring revenue stream that provides relative stability even when original equipment manufacturing (OEM) cycles soften. EPAC, by contrast, derives a larger share of revenue from project-based service work and capital equipment sales, making it more sensitive to industrial capital expenditure cycles and geopolitical disruptions.
On valuation, EPAC trades at a slightly lower trailing P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio of approximately 19.6 versus ATMU's roughly 20.5, though ATMU's premium is arguably supported by its stronger recent momentum and higher revenue growth rate. EPAC's adjusted EBITDA margins of approximately 25% exceed ATMU's roughly 20%, reflecting the higher-margin nature of specialized industrial tools, though EPAC's margins have been under pressure from service mix shifts. In terms of catalysts, EPAC's SFE Group acquisition could reshape its growth trajectory if integration proceeds smoothly, while ATMU's catalysts center on continued aftermarket share gains and the normalization of separation-related costs. Risk factors also diverge: ATMU faces concentration risk tied to the North American truck cycle, while EPAC contends with geopolitical exposure across EMEA (Europe, the Middle East, and Africa) and sensitivity to global infrastructure spending trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and positioning in the current market environment, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a near-term preference for ATMU over EPAC. ATMU has exhibited stronger and more consistent price momentum over recent months, supported by upward earnings revisions, an active buyback program, and a cleaner operational story following the separation from its former parent. While EPAC's SFE Group acquisition introduces a potentially transformative catalyst, the market has yet to price in the full benefits, and near-term headwinds in the service segment and geopolitical uncertainty create a less favorable short-term trend profile. That said, EPAC's lower valuation and the prospect of acquisition-driven earnings accretion may appeal to investors with a longer time horizon and higher tolerance for execution risk. In probabilistic terms, the AI would likely assign higher conviction to ATMU's prevailing trend, while acknowledging that EPAC's risk-reward profile could shift materially as the SFE integration unfolds in fiscal 2027.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a Buy and EPAC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ATMU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ATMU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATMU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ATMU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EPAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
ATMU is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.79% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Industrial Machinery (-1.07% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| ATMU | EPAC | ATMU / EPAC | |
| Capitalization | 4.22B | 1.83B | 231% |
| EBITDA | 344M | 150M | 229% |
| Gain YTD | -0.343 | -6.538 | 5% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.25 | 20.31 | 100% |
| Revenue | 1.83B | 634M | 288% |
| Total Cash | 210M | 116M | 181% |
| Total Debt | 1.06B | 185M | 572% |
EPAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ATMU | EPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 56% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FAI | 50.55 | 1.44 | +2.93% |
| First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund II | |||
| TALV | 28.78 | 0.18 | +0.63% |
| Transamerica Large Value Active ETF | |||
| UDEC | 42.03 | 0.20 | +0.48% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec | |||
| XHB | 103.69 | -0.83 | -0.79% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Hmebldr ETF | |||
| TILL | 18.03 | -0.17 | -0.92% |
| Teucrium Agricultural Str No K-1 ETF | |||
ATMU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATMU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMU | 100% | N/A | ||
| PH - ATMU | 73% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| DOV - ATMU | 69% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ITT - ATMU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| CMI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| DCI - ATMU | 67% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.81% | ||
| LECO - EPAC | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| RBC - EPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ATMU - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SNA - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| HLMN - EPAC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||