Equity Bancshares and Great Southern Bancorp, both regional banks focused on the Midwest, face similar challenges in a high-interest-rate environment, including deposit competition and loan demand. Earnings reports provide insights into net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits), asset quality, and growth strategies. EQBK's expansion via mergers contrasts with GSBC's organic stability, making this matchup key for gauging sector resilience.
Equity Bancshares (EQBK), the holding company for Equity Bank, will release Q1 2026 results after market close on April 14, followed by a conference call on April 15. Analysts project EPS of $1.21, up 27.8% year-over-year, and revenue of $85.24 million. This follows Q4 2025 net income of $22.1 million ($1.15 diluted EPS), with core EPS at $1.26 after acquisition costs. NII rose to $63.5 million, supported by NIM expansion to 4.47% (core 4.36%). The recent Frontier Holdings acquisition, closed January 1, added $1.3 billion in loans and $1.1 billion in deposits, pushing pro forma assets to $7.9 billion. Investors eye integration progress and loan growth amid CET1 (common equity tier 1, a key capital measure) of 13.1%.
Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), parent of Great Southern Bank, reports Q1 2026 earnings after close on April 15, with a call on April 16. Consensus calls for $1.29 EPS and $54.75 million revenue. Q4 2025 delivered $16.3 million net income ($1.45 EPS), up from $1.27 prior year, with full-year EPS at $6.19 (15% growth). NII was $49.2 million, reflecting disciplined expense management. With ~$5.8 billion in assets, ~$4 billion loans, and stable deposits, GSBC emphasizes core operations in Missouri markets, maintaining strong ROE (return on equity) around 13% and low NPAs (non-performing assets).
EQBK (~$940 million market cap) outpaces GSBC (~$720 million) in scale post-acquisitions, with higher NIM (4.47% vs. ~3.7%) but elevated M&A risks. Both beat Q4 estimates, but GSBC shows steadier EPS growth without integration costs. Loan portfolios are diversified (commercial real estate, C&I), with low NCOs (net charge-offs). Sentiment favors EQBK's growth trajectory (2026 EPS target >$5.00), while GSBC offers dividend reliability ($0.43 quarterly). Risks include rate cuts pressuring NIM and CRE exposure.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to enhance your investment strategy.
Tickeron AI leans toward EQBK (65% probability) for superior earnings growth potential from scale and NIM strength, though GSBC edges stability with consistent beats and lower volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EQBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EQBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.80% price change this week, while GSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.68%.
EQBK is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
GSBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| EQBK | GSBC | EQBK / GSBC | |
| Capitalization | 962M | 809M | 119% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.796 | 21.422 | 22% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.49 | 11.78 | 335% |
| Revenue | 229M | 229M | 100% |
| Total Cash | 699M | 94.1M | 743% |
| Total Debt | 446M | 496M | 90% |
EQBK | GSBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 71 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GSBC's Valuation (53) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQBK (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQBK’s over the last 12 months.
GSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EQBK (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to EQBK’s over the last 12 months.
GSBC's SMR Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EQBK (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to EQBK’s over the last 12 months.
GSBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EQBK (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to EQBK’s over the last 12 months.
EQBK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EQBK’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.
| EQBK | GSBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 11 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 64% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BEXIX | 23.52 | 0.76 | +3.34% |
| Baron Emerging Markets Institutional | |||
| ADSIX | 23.78 | 0.28 | +1.19% |
| American Century Disciplined Growth Inv | |||
| VLCAX | 174.32 | 1.91 | +1.11% |
| Vanguard Large Cap Index Admiral | |||
| LYRAX | 32.10 | 0.26 | +0.82% |
| Lyrical US Value Equity A | |||
| SCJIX | 8.21 | 0.05 | +0.61% |
| Steward Covered Call Income I | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQBK has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQBK jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQBK | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| GSBC - EQBK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| OSBC - EQBK | 79% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| BY - EQBK | 78% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| PRK - EQBK | 77% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| BHRB - EQBK | 77% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBC has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBC jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSBC | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| MBWM - GSBC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| PRK - GSBC | 83% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| OSBC - GSBC | 83% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| BHRB - GSBC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| BUSE - GSBC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||