Ad is loading...
EQH
Price
$47.44
Change
-$0.21 (-0.44%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
SLF
Price
$60.24
Change
-$0.82 (-1.34%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQH vs SLF

Header iconEQH vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs SLFBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$47.44
Change-$0.21 (-0.44%)
Volume$2.1M
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Life Financial
Price$60.24
Change-$0.82 (-1.34%)
Volume$381.68K
CapitalizationN/A
EQH vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. SLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a StrongSell and SLF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EQH: $47.44 vs. SLF: $60.24)
Brand notoriety: EQH and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 90% vs. SLF: 83%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $12.53B vs. SLF: $31.65B
EQH [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $12.53B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EQH and SLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

EQH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

SLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.72% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($31.6B) has a higher market cap than EQH($12.5B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than EQH: SLF (13.86) vs EQH (10.76). EQH YTD gains are higher at: 45.152 vs. SLF (16.159). EQH has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SLF (27.5B). EQH has less debt than SLF: EQH (5.63B) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than EQH: SLF (32.7B) vs EQH (10.5B).
EQHSLFEQH / SLF
Capitalization12.5B31.6B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.15216.159279%
P/E Ratio10.7613.8678%
Revenue10.5B32.7B32%
Total Cash75.3B27.5B274%
Total Debt5.63B13.3B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1550
SMR RATING
1..100
2997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
540
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (85). This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (50). This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's SMR Rating (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLF (97). This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SLF (44). This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (40). This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBP20.940.01
+0.05%
First BanCorp
SWK85.45-0.37
-0.43%
Stanley Black & Decker
NAK0.45N/A
-0.83%
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd
CTM0.17N/A
-1.00%
Castellum
CNOB27.09-0.31
-1.13%
ConnectOne Bancorp

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-0.44%
AIG - EQH
69%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
HIG - EQH
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
AEG - EQH
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
AVVIY - EQH
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
ORI - EQH
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
-1.34%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
AXAHY - SLF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
ALIZY - SLF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
EQH - SLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More