EQT
Price
$53.72
Change
-$0.17 (-0.32%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
33.6B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SJT
Price
$2.72
Change
-$0.18 (-6.21%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
126.78M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQT vs SJT

EQT vs SJT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQT vs. SJT commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQT is a Hold and SJT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (EQT: $53.72 vs. SJT: $2.72)
Brand notoriety: EQT: Notable vs. SJT: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQT: 83% vs. SJT: 131%
Market capitalization -- EQT: $33.6B vs. SJT: $126.78M
EQT [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $33.6B. SJT’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $126.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $162.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $10.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQT is a better buy in the long-term than SJT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SJT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQT is a better buy in the short-term than SJT.

Price Growth

EQT (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while SJT (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.60% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQT($33.6B) has a higher market cap than SJT($127M). SJT has higher P/E ratio than EQT: SJT (245.79) vs EQT (12.46). EQT YTD gains are higher at: 1.106 vs. SJT (-51.601). EQT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.93B vs. SJT (-754.36K). SJT has less debt than EQT: SJT (751K) vs EQT (5.66B). EQT has higher revenues than SJT: EQT (9.48B) vs SJT (0).
EQTSJTEQT / SJT
Capitalization33.6B127M26,457%
EBITDA6.93B-754.36K-919,052%
Gain YTD1.106-51.601-2%
P/E Ratio12.46245.795%
Revenue9.48B0-
Total CashN/A14.4K-
Total Debt5.66B751K753,129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQT vs SJT: Fundamental Ratings
EQT
SJT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2421
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
6598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5965
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQT's Valuation (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJT (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJT’s over the last 12 months.

EQT's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for SJT (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew significantly faster than SJT’s over the last 12 months.

EQT's SMR Rating (65) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SJT (98) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SJT’s over the last 12 months.

EQT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SJT (65) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that EQT’s stock grew similarly to SJT’s over the last 12 months.

SJT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQT (96) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that SJT’s stock grew significantly faster than EQT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQTSJT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SJT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOTRX11.380.10
+0.89%
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps R
MNDCX19.550.15
+0.77%
MFS New Discovery C
PJFAX64.170.40
+0.63%
PGIM Jennison Growth A
RYENX332.451.73
+0.52%
Rydex Energy A
MNMRX14.930.03
+0.20%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R

EQT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQT has been closely correlated with RRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQT jumps, then RRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQT
1D Price
Change %
EQT100%
-0.32%
RRC - EQT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
AR - EQT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
CRK - EQT
71%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
GPOR - EQT
70%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
CNX - EQT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More

SJT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJT has been loosely correlated with CRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJT jumps, then CRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJT
1D Price
Change %
SJT100%
-6.21%
CRK - SJT
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.89%
AR - SJT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
RRC - SJT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
EQT - SJT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SBR - SJT
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More