Ad is loading...
ERASX vs RPMGX
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$43.60
Change-$0.12 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.97B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.80
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.16B
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. ERASX (15B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: ERASX (0.15) vs RPMGX (0.05). ERASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ERASX (11 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. ERASX (14.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RPMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. RPMGX (2.65). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 14.64 vs. RPMGX (6.76).
| ERASX | RPMGX | ERASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.686 | 4.081 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15B | 31.2B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.05 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 2.65 | 493% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.34 | 0.95 | 1,517% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.64 | 6.76 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.63 | 38.25 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...