Ad is loading...
ERASX vs RPMGX
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$39.05
Change-$1.73 (-4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$89.05
Change-$4.76 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. ERASX (14.2B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: ERASX (0.21) vs RPMGX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ERASX (11 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.76). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RPMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.76 vs. RPMGX (-12.38). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 59.94 vs. RPMGX (34.25).
| ERASX | RPMGX | ERASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.76 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.76 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.020 | -5.936 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 27.4B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.76 | -12.38 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.41 | -10.32 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.94 | 34.25 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.28 | 16.26 | 322% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers