Ad is loading...
ERASX vs RPMGX
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$40.82
Change-$0.57 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.38B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.28
Change-$2.09 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.49B
ERASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. ERASX (15.4B). ERASX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: ERASX (0.15) vs RPMGX (0.05). ERASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ERASX (11 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. ERASX (14.00). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: RPMGX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.16 vs. RPMGX (-5.34). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 7.22 vs. RPMGX (1.27).
| ERASX | RPMGX | ERASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.925 | -0.451 | 648% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4B | 29.5B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.05 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.16 | -5.34 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.12 | -1.07 | -763% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.22 | 1.27 | 566% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.44 | 25.08 | 217% |