Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs TRQZX
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$42.51
Change+$0.23 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.46
Change+$0.44 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. ERASX (14.5B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ERASX: TRQZX (0.61) vs ERASX (0.21). ERASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ERASX (11 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: TRQZX (0) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. TRQZX (-0.43). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 27.43 vs. TRQZX (11.26).
| ERASX | TRQZX | ERASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.61 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.094 | 2.720 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 28B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.61 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | -0.43 | -1,105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.52 | 18.37 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.43 | 11.26 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement