Ad is loading...
ERASX vs TRQZX
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$39.31
Change+$0.60 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$92.28
Change+$1.98 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.74B
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.7B vs. ERASX (14.2B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ERASX: TRQZX (0.66) vs ERASX (0.21). ERASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ERASX (11 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.62). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: TRQZX (0) vs ERASX (5000000). ERASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. TRQZX (-12.66). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. TRQZX (12.53).
| ERASX | TRQZX | ERASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.943 | -10.346 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 25.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.66 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -12.66 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.13 | -7.12 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 12.53 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers