Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs TRQZX
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs TRQZX
ERASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. ERASX (8.97B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ERASX: TRQZX (0.72) vs ERASX (0.14). ERASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ERASX (12 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. ERASX (13.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: TRQZX (0) vs ERASX (5000000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.80 vs. ERASX (-11.95). ERASX (-16.76) and TRQZX (-17.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ERASX | TRQZX | ERASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.61 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.915 | 2.319 | -169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.97B | 22.5B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.72 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.95 | 0.80 | -1,500% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.41 | 4.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.76 | -17.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement