Advertisement
ESAB vs HUDI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESAB is a Hold and HUDI is a Hold.
| ESAB | HUDI | ESAB / HUDI | |
| Capitalization | 4.4B | 11.2M | 39,241% |
| EBITDA | 461M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -36.582 | -29.911 | 122% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.16 | 111.98 | 20% |
| Revenue | 3B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 217M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.54B | N/A | - |
| ESAB | HUDI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 23 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESAB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HUDI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUDI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESAB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUDI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ESAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUDI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
Price Growth
ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -5.77% price change this week, while HUDI (@Steel) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESAB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-2.69% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
@Steel (-3.10% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
Advertisement
ESAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with NWPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then NWPX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESAB | 100% | +2.05% | ||
| NWPX - ESAB | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| WOR - ESAB | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| RS - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ATI - ESAB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| PRLB - ESAB | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
More | ||||
HUDI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HUDI and FRD have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUDI and FRD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUDI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDI | 100% | +2.13% | ||
| FRD - HUDI | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
| GGB - HUDI | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| CMC - HUDI | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| MEC - HUDI | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ESAB - HUDI | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
More | ||||